English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-30 01:06:54 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

19 answers

Always!

2006-08-30 16:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by RandaBear 2 · 2 0

We start, then, with nothing, pure zero. But this is not the nothing of negation. For not means other than, and other is merely a synonym of the ordinal numeral second. As such it implies a first; while the present pure zero is prior to every first. The nothing of negation is the nothing of death, which comes second to, or after, everything. But this pure zero is the nothing of not having been born. There is no individual thing, no compulsion, outward nor inward, no law. It is the germinal nothing, in which the whole universe is involved or foreshadowed. As such, it is absolutely undefined and unlimited possibility -- boundless possibility. There is no compulsion and no law. It is boundless freedom.

Charles S. Peirce, "Logic of Events" (1898)

So there it is, just load of craop really like that question.

2006-08-30 08:13:34 · answer #2 · answered by dougie boy 3 · 0 1

Depends on the situation...like between eating and starving yes, between a not so good guy and nothing...no I'd go with no guy there is away someone out there available at night.

2006-08-30 08:10:41 · answer #3 · answered by X's Mommy 5 · 1 0

That depends on what the anything is. There are good anythings and there are bad anythings. I think I'd be careful choosing.

2006-08-30 08:12:39 · answer #4 · answered by Nola 6 · 1 0

no, sometimes it's better to have nothing at all than just anything.

2006-08-30 08:09:23 · answer #5 · answered by HazelEyes 5 · 1 0

something is always better than nothing

2006-08-30 08:10:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not necessarily. Anything could mean something bad

2006-08-30 08:09:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, taking the risk.

2006-08-30 08:11:26 · answer #8 · answered by crookshanks 2 · 1 0

Is an answer better than none at all?

2006-08-30 08:11:09 · answer #9 · answered by johnnyrebsn2002 2 · 1 0

When it comes right down to it, yes.

2006-08-30 09:17:39 · answer #10 · answered by Diesel Weasel 7 · 0 0

no not to me i want something with some worth rather than just
something i don't need. you know i want a whole man or none at all

2006-08-30 08:10:36 · answer #11 · answered by evian 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers