We're accused of EVERYTHING, from the last Ice Age to faking the 9/11 attack. Dont take it serious, its just the conspiracy nuts with too much time on their hands while waiting for the short bus.
2006-08-30 08:08:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is intervention in the affairs of another state. It is basically a similar manoeuvre to what they are doing in Iraq, only in reverse. There they wish to encourage a democracy in the hope that the aspirations of the peoples in surrounding countries will encourage a change of government. In Venezuela it's the opposite they don't want a popular socialist government, that is pro-Cuba having a political effect on the rest of South America.
2006-08-30 09:05:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by bob kerr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Earlier this year a right wing christian (I forget his name) called for the assassination of Chavez. He supports Bush.
The situation of Venezuela is unique in South America, apart from Bolivia which expericenced revolution last year. Venezuela has massive oil reserves (in the top ten of the world) and Chavez has infuriated the neo-liberals by nationalising the water system. Much more can be done but it's a damn sight better than my country!
2006-08-30 12:56:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The U. S. tries to destabilise any state that doesn't agree with its policies ... ask Grenada, Nicaragua, Iraq, Cuba, etc. etc.
2006-08-30 18:52:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by micksmixxx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chavez is really pi*sing Monkey George off and that's good enough for me!
2006-08-30 08:05:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Roxy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
They have oil and George wants it. He is an oil vampire. Insatiable appetite for crude.
2006-08-30 08:44:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Chavez is doing a good enough job of that himself!!
2006-08-30 08:00:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by WheeeeWhaaaaa 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The US is ALWAYS trying to destabilize some country or other
2006-08-30 08:00:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ya-sai 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
the United States get their nose where it should not be
2006-08-30 08:03:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
they are but not this time.
2006-08-31 03:35:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋