2006-08-29 23:43:28 · 9 answers · asked by Scottie 4 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
Nope, but that would be cool. Scott Evil has a nice ring to it.
2006-08-29 23:55:44 · update #1
Sorry. I do not know.
But I like Your brand...
My I ask : Are You Scott Evil from
"Austin Powers" ???!
2006-08-29 23:51:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are different terms, in my opinion. Bestiality refers specifically to sexual intercourse between a human and an animal. Inter-species erotica could be a dramatically scored film of a horse and a cow having a romantic interlude, or a graphic novel about the forbidden love between Golgos of Planet Armoos and Ambobo of the Barnikerken Galaxy.
2006-08-30 22:19:00 · answer #2 · answered by miguelitabonita 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Betiality is fine. AIDS may be better. Or ebola infection.
Or human degradation.
Or YUCK!
Or get sense.
Or, are there really humans that even find bestiality as something that should be considered at all?
Or, inconceivable.
Whatever, it's disgusting.
2006-08-30 06:49:55 · answer #3 · answered by mug 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This presumes that there is a politically correct way of saying bestiality. Animal rape might be more accurate.
Can you say "infection"?... I knew you could...
2006-08-30 06:55:39 · answer #4 · answered by Magic One 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Erotica is art. Beastiality is not. Unless you mean Beauty And the Beast.
2006-08-30 07:38:55 · answer #5 · answered by MrAndersonMan 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I prefer "cross-species collaboratory gathering."
2006-08-30 06:50:08 · answer #6 · answered by angrysandwichguy1 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What are you on? "self sexual-gratifier"
2006-08-30 06:51:26 · answer #7 · answered by John 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, it would be the same as saying ONE SICK ****!!!
2006-08-30 13:55:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
lmao, yes!!
2006-08-30 06:48:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋