Simple both (Indian occupied kashmir & Pakistan semi independent Kashmir) Kashmir parts should become a state Name as ''ISLAMIC AZAD KASHMIR''. And Islamic Azad Kashmir should be an Islamic state having the rules of Quran & Sunnah.
Please Pray that may Almighty Allah do so.
Aameen.
2006-08-29 22:29:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by truth speaker 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
the governments of the 2 countries should first ask the residents of kashmir their opinion of to whom they will accept because they too have the freedom to express their thoughts so by doing this may bring a peacefull resolution to kashmir's issue ,now it is only a political issue and not a public issue
2006-08-29 22:08:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No need to take opinion of residents of Kashmir, because in 1948 when Pakistan attacked Kashmir, Harisingh Dogra pleaded for military help from India and accepted that if India will help then Kashmir will be the part of India, India immediately sent their troops for defense bcoz Pakistani military were few kilometers away from vital Jammu airport. After this incident it is a clear fact that Kashmir is part of India and neighbors are supporting militants groups for their political interest. To maintain peace in Kashmir, India should accept Counter Terrorism. This is the most effective weapon for terrorists. The latest example of Counter terrorism is Israel against Lebanon.
Best answer appreciated
2006-08-29 22:28:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by serious! 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is a solution for Kashmir as Pakistan wants to cut out a new land for Muslims. If you believe the recent survey of CNN most of the Pakistanis believe that India and Pakistan should keep the LOC as permanent. If you ask Balochis in Pakistan they will say they want separation from Pakistan and if you ask Sindhis they reply the same. It is because their leaders taught them that Pakistan government is only for Punjabis and not for them. Plebiscite will decide Balochis and Sindhis matters?
The solution is to consider the LOC as permanent and if anybody think by was they can get Kashmir they are in fool's paradise.
2006-08-29 22:33:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by AJIT LEO 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are plenty of solutions to the "issue".
however, it requires, like all conflict, that everyone is prepared to come together and respect each other, and realise there is not one issue, or one solution.
If people were prepared to put as much effort into peace as they do war, guns & bombs then all issues can be resolved in a way that everyone wins. but being a "fighter" gives people so much pleasure & purpose that peace is seen as boring and worthless.
And Kashmir includes Ladakh, which is tibettan buddist, and have had a sustainable tolerant society for 1,000 years, so they may be used to mediate between hindu & muslem.
2006-08-29 22:19:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by fred 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes of course
1. withdrawl of 7.5 million strong indian army from kashmir
2. Immediate end to the looting , plundering and raping spree by indian army
3. Holding of a free plebisite under UN control
and there you have the solution to Kashmir
2006-08-29 22:15:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by coolkid 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you asking about the various years old possession difficulty or the ''ongoing violence'' difficulty brother? we are spending extravagantly on Kashmir and nicely ought to eliminate it, IF in any respect there changed into actual answer in so giving freely to someone - locals, Pakis or chinese or in share to ''bidders''. notwithstanding the peoblem is not in basic terms Kashmir, notwithstanding that's an excuse to keep alive a hostility in the subcontinent with assorted gamers, each and each having an interest of its own! simple to wager and so I leave it to the communicate board. about modern difficulty, the persons to blame are the state authorities and the centre mixed. both had pampered the separatists for too lengthy. Even the critical ruling get mutually had shared skill with general secessionist outfit in the state. the armed forces and police are lower than stress from performing difficult, being suggested by using both micro and macro rulers, to assuage rebels who would not settle for something short of anarchy. they received't choose police to capture stone pelters or the armed forces to apply its device yet cajole the weapon weilding miscreants or face expenditures of 'excesses'! possibility free locals who in basic terms choose an excellent governance from someone, the police who choose a authorities that ought to comprehend a thanks to regulate a regulation and order equipment, the media that hanker for ''warm information stuff'' to excite the customers, the neighbour ever busy to push set off factors interior a non violent terrain and shout 'wolf' even as the triggers are being quelled.. and a authorities that lights fixtures candles on each part.. all are in the game, to confound the confusion! except the human beings and the a lot careworn police stress, no different participant is prepared to have the topics 'solved' yet favor to 'take care of' for his or her 'words'. They recognize each and each problable ''answer'' has its share of more beneficial extreme impacts and ought to least brook a attempt!!! Insha Allah! whats up Ram!
2016-11-23 14:08:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Decision of Kasmir should be upto the Kashmiris
2006-08-29 22:14:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Led Zeppelin owns.
2006-08-29 22:09:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by pyroboy70167 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
by spirit of goodwill and understanding in negotiating out complex issues standing out unresolved.
2006-08-29 22:16:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋