2006-08-29 21:16:04 · 11 answers · asked by Marlboro Hamster 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Because the Science Community has a personal vendetta against Pluto from looking at Uranus. Ha Ha, get it?
2006-08-29 21:22:23 · answer #1 · answered by mixwithanything 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Science is about un-ended learning. If one theory can be viably proved wrong a good scientist would try to find another answer. Science changes like everything else. The astronomers have new evidence that might prove that Pluto isn't a planet, why not find out.
It scares me to think what would happen if one was to force one answer to be correct forever when there is evidence to prove otherwise. We would be back in the dark ages persecuting people who ask questions.
2006-08-30 04:28:52 · answer #2 · answered by Aleaha S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Confirming their increasing brilliance is their version of a golf outing.
They didn't decide that because Pluto is not a planet, we now have to nuke Pluto out of existence. It's harmless so, let them do it.
Of course, you have to keep an eye on them. If they start talking about how Pluto is needlessly using up solar system resources, you gotta draw the line.
2006-08-30 09:31:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because science doesn't just lie there, all done. Scientists have to, by nature of their nature, pick over questions like "Is Pluto a planet or an orbiting dwarf?" over and over again.
2006-08-30 05:58:28 · answer #4 · answered by soxrcat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's animal abuse I tell you!! Oh wait... what Pluto are we talking about again?
2006-08-30 04:21:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bcuz PLuto is to small
And it looks more like gas, not solid
2006-08-30 04:22:31 · answer #6 · answered by Jose 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
cuz pluto turns them on
2006-08-30 04:19:17 · answer #7 · answered by 0_0 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
and miss the oppurtunity of unravelling Her secrets? u got to be ignorant enough to give such a suggestion.
2006-08-30 04:22:47 · answer #8 · answered by Ajay A 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because doing so would compromise their integrity as scientists?
2006-08-30 04:20:03 · answer #9 · answered by sandesmus 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your question makes sense - since you're a Mouse! :-)
2006-08-30 04:20:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋