A pole in a Brittish news paper suggested that 87% out of a 1000 women thought that washing there man's underpants was paramount to any realationship. I was at school at the time my 'ego disintigrated after reading this nonscence but ever since I have looked at all women with suspician. Surley men are worth more than a ''quick get em off, give me your pants they need to go straight into the wash tub for a scrub'. If there are any women out there please stick two fingers up at this pole and tell the truth.
2006-08-29 21:12:47 · 10 answers · asked by Redmonk 6 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I've never heard such guff in my entire life. Why would any self-respecting woman feel that washing her partner's undies was paramount to their relationship. I've NEVER, NEVER, NEVER washed my partner's undies. He's a grown man and as such must be responsible for his own underpants. Washing his ever-so-slightly-soiled undies would be the biggest turn-off ever. I certainly wouldn't be thinking "now I've washed his skiddie undies I have the uncontrollable urge to drag him into the bedroom and hump him stupid". It'd make me gag and think "oh dear God - is this what my life has become?" Get a grip ladies. Mutual respect, love, understanding, support and trust are paramount to any relationship. NOT WASHING DIRTY UNDERPANTS!!!
2006-08-30 01:34:54 · answer #1 · answered by trog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
think ofyou've have been given to be kidding suitable? certainly you have the internet and watch T.V. you have a companion and that's often stated because of the fact the main suitable male fantasy. i'm particular you does no longer think of approximately friendly any sexual exploration without your companion suitable? if so then you certainly could desire to sense accountable. cheating is cheating-----is cheating. --you may relax certain, offering he's no longer a preacher or rather religious, that he does no longer purely help your determination he would be your superb chum --Bi- skill you swing the two methods. even if society has many times been greater suited of woman Bi-(adult males particularly) than male that's greater time-honored than ever now. --i'm no longer likely to bypass into my intercourse existence yet we've been married over 32 years and going solid. --right this is a project. you may open a can of worms you won't like the style of. A style of of eden is a style of eden. you may, for despite motives, ascertain you do no longer like it. Your mate, could desire to you have chose to incorporate him and not cheat, could rather love issues, alot. The can of worms may be the swinging area and your mate being with yet another lady. it is going to no longer be a project as you the two would be there, even with the shown fact that it ought to. It takes a secure dating and maximum purely think of they are guard. additionally you would be much less bored in existence. 2 of my daughter's have explored bi- and the two are "on the instant" with a delicate bend. --My propose is to maintain fantasies merely that. An exception could be a joint challenge that should substitute and advance your existence or create issues. the tip consequence could be which you may then understand an answer on your innovations. --At any fee this takes discussions, limits, and non-negotiable rules, that's what I even have examine besides.
2016-12-11 17:43:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was a pole in a Brittish newspaper?? I think you mean a poll in a British newspaper. I suggest you stop worrying about underpants and go back to school.
2006-08-29 21:18:01 · answer #3 · answered by Away With The Fairies 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Listen, mate, would washing my dirty panties be a sexual turn on for you? What are you just talking about? If a woman is crazy about her partners underpants it means she's obsessed with cleanliness and not her partner
2006-08-29 21:26:50 · answer #4 · answered by Faith * 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
errrmmm....no, this is not paramount to a relationship. Underpants are the last thing on my mind when I think about my b/f.
2006-08-29 23:32:36 · answer #5 · answered by sparkleythings_4you 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When was this 1921?
2006-08-29 21:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by A G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what on earth? i bet that was in the sun news paper they usualy print alod of crap no way not at all in face im lmao if it can go in the hole then no problems with me hands toching its cloth
2006-08-29 21:16:48 · answer #7 · answered by chickenbutt 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sounds british but then I'm not a woman. have fun. seems sick to meee
2006-08-29 21:17:13 · answer #8 · answered by sllyjo 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
can only have been the sunday sport...
2006-08-29 21:16:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
where did you get all this from******************************************
2006-08-31 08:57:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋