2006-08-29 20:53:09 · 8 answers · asked by sandra k 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Great artist
Am moralist
Self centered
Bad tempered
Lousy companion
Lousy father
GREAT ARTIST
2006-08-30 14:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by Mac 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like many artists, he went through phases of art. Check out his history and you find he was even a sculpture. Many people find his lifestyle questionable. I can get past that. An artist is an artist is an artist. Life is definitely different in the artist circle. Typically.
2006-08-30 05:12:07 · answer #2 · answered by Melody 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When he created recognizable figures, he was good. Then he created grotesque trash which, for some reason, coincided perfectly with the 20th century's collective degeneration into artistic insanity.
2006-09-06 01:10:16 · answer #3 · answered by ebemdpa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least two--that he was a great artist, or that he sucked. I pick the latter.
2006-09-03 18:49:24 · answer #4 · answered by nacmanpriscasellers 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a little bit different but most of his stuff is alright
2006-09-06 16:55:04 · answer #5 · answered by katlvr125 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His Blue period is great.The rest suck.
2006-08-30 03:59:34 · answer #6 · answered by eva b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
confusing.
breath-taking.
passionate.
creates timeless masterpieces...
2006-09-03 04:14:06 · answer #7 · answered by edelweiss 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
varied and many
2006-09-04 19:40:48 · answer #8 · answered by Spaghetti MY 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋