how can it be funny if youcant hear the joke? normal speeds are better.
but charlie chap has to be in hyperspeed and bush in slow motion :))
2006-08-29 19:04:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by The AnswerMan ? (J.L.A) 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Monty Python would always use hyper-speed and get good laughs. If the scene is funny to begin with, slow motion could help ad anticipation of the effect. I guess it depends on the scene.
2006-08-30 01:59:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by s.texaswrknman 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
A scene where someone falls down - definitely funnier in slow motion... but in a scene where someone is having a ridiculously funny verbal disagreement (fight) then hyper speed is hilarious...
2006-08-30 02:02:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Slow-Motion!
2006-08-30 01:54:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Emmaliz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Slow motion and backwards at the same time.
2006-08-30 02:46:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually if it's in slow-motion, it's supposed to be more dramatic. If it's in hyper-speed, it's supposed to be more humorous.
2006-08-30 01:55:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
slow motion indeeeedddd.. the best way to describe that is when u run a boxing match in slow motion , it becomes hilarious :)
2006-08-30 01:55:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by yoyo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the scene... if it is a scene where you are riding on a bullet... definatly slow mo... but if it is football... i like it in fast motion... all those tight butts flying by in record time!
2006-08-30 01:56:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cutelilminxy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
slow motion
2006-08-30 10:58:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Katherine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
slow motion
2006-08-30 02:11:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cheezy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋