The conservatives breed wars , they pretend to be conservatives of moral values while in fact they are the most immoral party who fund wars and prepare ennemies to fight for many years to come
2006-08-29 18:05:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by kitty 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
What do you think about the link between Conservatives and terrorism? Why have they helped our enemies (corrected)?
Two questions; two answers.
1.) Terrorists kill Conservatives, Liberals, Independants, Jews, Catholics, Agnostics, Wiccans, Muslims, Men, Women and Children. My apologies to any group I left out, rest assured, the terrorists will include you if given the chance. Conservatives are about as closely linked to terrorism as Stalin was to Nuclear Disarmament.
2.) Why have they helped the enemy? Well, I suppose you could make that argument valid if you apply the logic that by sending troops to where the enemy is thereby exposing them you have made the terrorists job easier; that could be construed as help. It's weak, but, technically valid.
To address your commentary:
241 Marines were killed in 1983 Beruit, not 300.
270 People killed in Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The US did not respond militarily but insisted on and eventually recieved the extradition of those responsible from Libya. Both men were convicted of crimes against humanity in a trial held in Brussels. They claimed the bombing was in retaliation of the 15 Apr 1986 bombing of Libya.
Bin Laden was engaged against the Soviets (remember them), we financed the Mujahaadin of which Bin Laden was affiliated, we didn't finance Bin Laden directly.
The Bin Laden family construction business is the largest in the Middle East, it would be impossible to hire a construction firm there that wasn't somehow related.
The Saudi government named Bush Sr. an honorable member of the Saudi Royal Family as tribute to the US response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and for preventing the Iraqi advance into Saudi Arabia. It amounts to a very sincere, royal thank you.
Bush has not vetoed any monies earmarked for homeland security, ANY.
Bin Ladena swore to attack America in 1990. He was responsible for many attacks well before 2001, his determination was no secret and the report you refer to had no specific information in it.
Clinton had an opprotunity to launch an attack in Afghanistan in 1996 that would have likely killed Bin Laden, he decided not to when it was discovered that there was a swing set in the yard of the target building and the attack could likely kill children.
I don't believe Bush is an idiot, I don't blame Clinton, public opinion would have slaughtered him had the swing set been seen on CNN. What really helps the enemy? Splashing their propaganda all over the news. Refusing to place the blame on those using civilians as shields when those civilians get killed. Reporting clandestine methods of tracking terrorist financial dealings handcuffing authorities. The war on terror is not a partisan war. Quit complaining when a GI gets killed, that's what they pay us to do.
Before you start the slander, know that I am a GI with 22 years on active duty. I've been to Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Jordan, and Kuwait and I volunteered every time I went. I AM NOT a hero, simply a patriot.
2006-08-29 18:32:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bake 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
This has to be the furthest stretching of the truth I have ever seen. You and Michael Moore have done one to many bong hits.
Notable Terror Attcaks under Clinton :
Kidnappings of U.S. Citizens in Colombia, January 31, 1993:
World Trade Center Bombing, February 26, 1993:
Attempted Assassination of President Bush by Iraqi Agents, April 14, 1993:
Attack on U.S. Diplomats in Pakistan, March 8, 1995:
Bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City, April 19, 1995:
Attack on U.S. Embassy in Moscow, September 13, 1995:
Khobar Towers Bombing, June 25, 1996: A fuel truck carrying a bomb exploded outside
the US military's Khobar Towers housing facility in Dhahran, killing 19 U.S. military
personnel and wounding 515 persons, including 240 U.S. personnel. Several groups
claimed responsibility for the attack.
Empire State Building Sniper Attack, February 23, 1997:
U.S. Embassy Bombings in East Africa, August 7, 1998:
USS Cole
2006-08-29 16:32:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Did you just now rent Fahrenheit 9/11 or something?
Hey you should probably check out these links:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=propaganda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda
Or better yet, watch episode 902 ("Die Hippie, Die") of Comedy Central's South Park:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Hippie%2C_Die
2006-08-29 16:49:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by lcamccandlj 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah we know the liberal game plan too. Cover your butts, blame it on Bush. So your really shouldn't be talking.
2006-08-29 16:19:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Luekas 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ha ha! You've gone from ignorant to just plain stupid statements! Congratulations! Keep it up. You'll be ready for party membership quite soon!
2006-08-29 16:22:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Kerry is Bin Laden's man...
Bush is mine.
2006-08-29 16:16:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sigh..................
2006-08-29 16:16:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by kelikristina 4
·
1⤊
0⤋