Those sheep have blue streaks on their back, not yellow.
2006-08-29 16:08:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
9⤋
I see you're on who equates training (a technique), with awareness (it is needed effect). there is better than one course to awareness and coaching, regrettably, would not consistently lead there. as a result, i will comfortably admit that I surely have neither the educational nor the understanding to evaluate the technology in the back of the claims. whether I did I doubt that i might have the time or inclination to delve into the voluminous source data and are available to a decision for myself. So how do I evaluate the competing claims? the comparable way I evaluate any competing claims the place i've got not got first hand awareness, i glance on the data I do have. What I see right it is a medical declare that appeared to dovetail completely with an unrelated political philosophy. each and every reason for worldwide warming is by persons exercising economic freedom; each and every therapy is a huge enhance of government capacity. apart from the folk helping it act like liars. Opposing perspectives are no longer debated, they are ridiculed. They use political words like "consensus" with a view to marginalize the skeptics. They call skeptics "deniers" with a view to equate them with the bogeymen of Holocaust deniers. They link their investment to grease companies a bogeyman of the ideological left. They equate climate skepticism with creationism with a view to link them with non secular human beings, yet another left wing bogeyman. in addition they ask questions like this one to aim to silence debate. finally, those that are crying maximum loudly that it is a disaster are behaving least like there fairly is one. Al Gore and something of the Gulfsteam environmentalists spew CO2 like there isn't any the next day. i could no longer have a sophisticated technology degree, yet i'm able to recognize leftist propaganda once I see it.
2016-10-01 01:52:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by mclaurin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they were you they would be lemmings!
Why don't you grow up and quit dishonoring yourself and a man who has 2 Purple Hearts and a Silver star! You don't like his politics fine, but I have learned over the past few months Republicans have no respect for the military or their widows! And you are living proof!
Hate the guy, but you are way out of line! And why Kerry? He'll never get the nomination!
I'm with you Jesi, and I thing Mr scary has his hip boots on!
2006-08-29 16:15:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Yes. The Conservative one is like that too but all the sheep are black.
2006-08-29 17:46:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Somebody needs to get more of a life and spend less time looking at beastiality pictures and worrying about John Kerry.
And seriously, I've seen like half of these Conservative fools answering your other posts too, are you like some sort of little idiot-cabal?
Find something reasonable to argue about, or stop wasting cyberspace.
2006-08-29 16:14:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Can you come up with something original? How many times have you asked this question?
Repeat after me boys and girls: "I'm John Skerry and I'm a LOSER!"
2006-08-29 17:23:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Mr skerry you been in the sheep dip again?
2006-08-29 21:53:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Looks more like Republicans to me. They're the ones who follow GWB like sheep.
2006-08-29 16:08:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by cool_breeze_2444 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
I notice they are all bent over and lined up. They may be liberals trying to appease the Muslims! Good photo!
2006-08-29 16:23:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
This says it better!
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b107/phantom12321/conservatives.gif
2006-08-29 17:58:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Baby #3 due 10/13/09 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Very Skerry!
2006-08-29 16:23:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋