English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i get a kick out of cons who post what they think liberals believe, not bothering to ask in a civil tone.

2006-08-29 15:54:25 · 21 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

Why don't you propose a truce? John Skerry and Shiraz will keep quiet if the liberals who lie and push the socialist, anti-Bush, anti-American propaganda do the same. Of course I'm not authorized to speak for Messrs Skerry or Shiraz, I'm just offering to serve as a go between.

Name the time for a cease fire and I'll relay your request.

2006-08-29 16:06:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I get a kick out of it, too--to a certain extent--then I get p.o.ed! I hate having these ignorant big-mouths, who really don't want to have a debate or to discuss differences in a civil way, put words in my mouth!! I am a liberal, and I've been around for a pretty long while, watching and learning. I don't just make snap decisions, nor do I follow a "party" line. (Many, many Dems are NOT liberal.)

I also get a kick out of this particular loud-mouth when he constantly says that liberals "follow the crowd" and that, somehow, conservatives are the "alpha" thinkers. The whole definitions of "liberal" and "Conservative" deny that characterization. Conservatives are the ones who want things to remain the same, while liberals are usually open to trying new things!

If john skerry was the typical conservative, I might be more upset, but I think that he is just a fringe-nut.

2006-08-29 16:06:14 · answer #2 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 3 1

You shouldn't throw stones if you post questions like this:


moses
Level 1
cons why should terrorists attack US soil?
americans would immediately support the iraq war and bushs military pursuit of all terrorists........

you can quit attributing no attacks on US soil to the brilliant GW.lol...they arent trying ..........

you think they couldnt get across the US/Mex border if they wanted?..

con=morons

2006-08-29 16:03:24 · answer #3 · answered by eric l 6 · 2 0

You advantageous a eye-catching youthful lady, and dazzling eyes....yet directly to the question.....it is not appropriate what we expect of, he's an American, and has the acceptable of loose speech, no count in case you settle with him or no longer.....you could consistently in simple terms pass by utilising his questions

2016-10-01 01:52:05 · answer #4 · answered by mclaurin 4 · 0 0

In all honesty, he is but one within an intellectually honest and elite class (however minuscule) asking refreshingly intelligent questions on Yahoo! answers. Go Skerry!

2006-08-29 17:32:50 · answer #5 · answered by LastNerveLost 3 · 0 3

You are just mad because someone is fighting back against all the Bush bashers out there. How does it feel to be made fun of? Welcome to Bush's world! He has to put up with that everyday.

2006-08-29 16:10:36 · answer #6 · answered by Luekas 4 · 1 1

I'll take ignorant for 500, Alex.

2006-08-29 16:00:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

My vote would be for the idiot part, most drunks are more civil (and intelligent) than him.

2006-08-29 15:58:31 · answer #8 · answered by Kevin O 2 · 5 1

And just because you're correct, that's still not a valid reason to bash someone else. It's not polite.

Don't sink to their level. Just ignore them and hopefully someday they'll just go away.

2006-08-29 16:00:21 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5 2

Nice civil question. LOL. Do you always contradict yourself like that?

2006-08-29 16:34:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers