When one side has an overwhelming technological advantage, we require it to minimize civilian casualties. However, if the enemy does not wear a uniform and blends into the civilian population, doesn't that counterbalance the technological advantage...thus removing (or at least lessening) the requirement to avoid all civilian casualties?
2006-08-29 15:35:47 · 4 answers · asked by Brand X 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
surgical warfare: being able to accurately target without mistakes.
2006-08-29 15:39:35 · update #1
I think the US promotes it, but in reality you can still hit the proverbial "milk factory" so no matter what you do you have to win the propaganda war.
2006-08-29 15:47:05 · answer #1 · answered by 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
heres your americas finest at work using surgical targeting to hit civilians on purpose .... it doesnt lessen anything ... the war in iraq is wrong period ... we are there for the wrong reasons ... and people are dying for lies.
2006-08-29 22:48:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
?Surgical warfare? I'm not sure what you mean by that... Doing surgeries on our opponents?
2006-08-29 22:38:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes indeed it does!
2006-08-29 22:41:33 · answer #4 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋