if you was stinking filthy rich
2006-08-29 15:12:50 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
had seen a pick of kayne west is watch 9.5 carats
2006-08-29 15:19:41 · update #1
why not?
I've got a collection... $2,800, $875, $1,375 and a $895... not too bad for a starter.
Love watches.
2006-08-29 15:16:47 · answer #1 · answered by lolitakali 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. Because a Cheap, Overrated Watch like that couldn't Hold Phone Numbers and Appointments like My $58 Casio DBC-310.It can Hold 300 Items of Info, Countdown Timer, Stopwatch, Alarms, Etc.I would Spend that kind of Money Perfecting My Vaporcarb, which My Avatar is a Photo of. Figure it Out !
2006-08-29 22:22:07 · answer #2 · answered by gvaporcarb 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That's a ridiculous amount of money to pay for something you can get for $9.99 that will serve the same purpose. I'd probably never be in a "Stinking Filthy Rich" situation, not only because I'll probably never win the lottery, but because I'll spend the money where it needs to be spent most; helping people and charities. Money only brings temporary happiness, but friends and family are forever.
2006-08-29 22:18:25 · answer #3 · answered by rms21560 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
H*ll ya I would. Why not you can't take all of that money with you so why save it. But after the watch I would get me a grill
2006-08-29 22:15:22 · answer #4 · answered by 50fifty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I 'm just a plain ole country girl so money doesnt mean much so no i don't think so kindaq like larry the cable guy he doesnt act rich does he!!!!! GET"R"DUN oooppppsss GOT"ER"DID
2006-08-29 22:16:57 · answer #5 · answered by If_OnLy_YoU_cOULD 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I would still not spend $100,000 on a watch! Now... a ring... yes
2006-08-29 22:15:50 · answer #6 · answered by Mama R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if it was offered for free on internet and hit wrong botton opening wallet that should not exist
2006-08-29 22:21:28 · answer #7 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never,I hate watches or anything around the wrist!
2006-08-29 22:18:11 · answer #8 · answered by Teal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I wouldn't. I think that is a waste and I don't need a watch that expensive.
2006-08-29 22:25:29 · answer #9 · answered by Nico 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's an investment. Rolex, I assume
2006-08-29 22:15:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋