English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Poll on CNN.com has Iran prez winning!
And don't give me answers like...
CNN is a liberal station...
Bull on that!
CNN IS A REPUBLICAN station cuz it does
not report stories on all of Bushie's MANY lies...

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS
A LIBERAL NEWS STATION!

Who would win a debate on world issues between
President Bush & Iranian President Ahmadinejad?

Bush 37%
35,056 votes

Ahmadinejad 63%
58,708 votes

Total: 93,764 votes
(This is the AMERICAN people voting folks!)

Course maybe Bush would have a
fighting chance if his "back bulge box"
is out of the repair shop before the debate?

2006-08-29 14:13:25 · 15 answers · asked by BUSH IS A CLOWN 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Bush might win, if he's got Chenney's hand up his but like the puppet that he is!

2006-08-29 14:17:18 · answer #1 · answered by Chicago JC 2 · 2 2

CNN is NOT a Republican station. You must be out of your mind to think that. Well its obvious you are to say that there is no such thing as a liberal news station.
But anyways, it goes to show how messed up people are in even our own country. How in the world could you believe that lunitac clown from Iran would win a debate on solving world issues with Bush? Bush is the one fighting for what it seems is the world to make this a better place. To attack terrorists before they attack us and to protect our country. Iran stands for tyranny. Another country with a dictator who hates us and hates Israel and would destroy us when he gets the chance. Anyone who thinks he would win a debate, why dont you all go pack you s h i t up and get the hell out of this country. You either believe Ahmadinejad would ever tell the truth during the debate (and honestly the guy would not be truthful, hes making nuke weapons and lying about it) and maybe you believe he means the world well. LMFAO youve got to be kidding me.
Youre right, that was Americans voting, but sadly some 60,000 people are in the wrong country. And to the dumb ***** that asked this question, you and whoever else who wouldnt back are own president up in a debate with an evil dictator, go f u c k yourselves and please leave the United States and dont come back

2006-08-29 14:31:31 · answer #2 · answered by Bucfan 2 · 0 4

Ahmadinejad (Iran President)

They are opposing the Economic genocide perpertrated on Iran with Nuclear energy restriction, to make them dependant of Oil !!!!!

Bush, Kerry, Clinton, Cheney are all admited lifetime members of the Skull and Bone society, the lodge 322 of the Bavarian Illuminati.
The Illuminati are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World order, ruled by the martial law.
They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
Bush and Kerry | Skull and Bone : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull
Loose Change 2 Nd Edition : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&q=
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_consciousness (Class consciousness)
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name...and his number is Six hundred & sixty-six. (Rev. 13:15-18)

“the zenith meridian at Giza runs through Jupiter at the Hyades in Taurus”, this means “the kingdom (Jupiter) will be restored to Egypt (Taurus) at that precise moment. Thus, Osiris, the Bull of Egypt, will return from the dead at 22:18:13 on December 21, 2012.” El Cairo time.
Prophecy : http://www.diagnosis2012.co.uk/1.htm

2006-08-29 15:10:57 · answer #3 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0 2

Extreme Conservatives and Extreme Liberals just love to see their selves on the television and all other forms of informations. They would end up in a tie since both live in a fantasy world. Both behave as emperors. I would vote for Andy Panda.

2006-08-29 14:19:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This is what I believe happened when Bush heard about the challenge.

Bush, shrugs and smiles that cocky smile of his and says, "Yeah, I'll debate him, when is this?"

Cheney, Rumsfield, Rice and everyone else INCLUDING the interns look at each other with horror and said, "No, No, No Mr. President, that would not be a good idea,... we, ah don't talk to them remember, they're terrorist, you know the bad guys."

Bush, "Oh yeah. Ok, I take it back, you know I'm the President so I'm not going to talk to that guy but I can still bomb him right?"

2006-08-29 14:27:46 · answer #5 · answered by choyryu 2 · 4 0

Here is another propaganda adventure. First of all, is this poll random and scientific? No on the surface because CNN does not have a random sampling of Americans. They are an insignificant network that has tremendous liberal bias.

Pres Bush would never be in the same room as that killer. Iran will get his day and it will be soon. I wonder how many of people like you who have a lot of time on your hands voted for Ahmadwhatever. I bet you voted more than once.

2006-08-29 14:18:00 · answer #6 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1 4

It depends on who is judging the debate and what the criteria for winning are.

For example, back in the 1980 election Jimmy Carter debated Ronald Reagan. I watched that debate in its entirety. Carter was on message, knew his facts, scored points that any University level debating club would have recognized and appeared presidential.

Reagan said: "Heh, heh, there you go again." and was widely judged in the media as having won the debate and went on to win the election.

Bush couldn't debate a grade school child in a proper debating forum and win. He hasn't a clue how to do it. But apparently his chicken-hawk strut, arms akimbo and a look on his face as though he has personally toppled Saddam Hussein instead of getting the real men and women of the army he never bothered to serve in to do it for him, impresses some people.

Figure that one out!

2006-08-29 14:39:43 · answer #7 · answered by Rory McRandall 3 · 0 2

If it is American citizens voting on that poll, it is disgusting. How can anyone deny their standing president support internationally. When a standing president is in office I don't agree with, I share my dislike with a close group of friends...

The fact that American people are not standing behind their leader internationally looks weak. Not weak on the person in charge. Weak on us, as a nation.

As for Iran. Bush told them to end their program. Israel needs to take the lead though in getting Syria and Iran under control, Iraq is good as long as the liberal US citizens don't pull a midnight freedom rescue of Saddam along with a tree to plant....the US and Japan should at the same time let China and North Korea know, they are being called out.

Russia will flip flop.

France will run and cry to the UN....

2006-08-29 14:36:58 · answer #8 · answered by cypress9silver 2 · 1 4

I easily have some amazing timber in my backyard. some are all eco-friendly jointly as others have plant existence. they are all amazing. Oh, you recommend George W. Bush. No. amazing isn't a word i might use to describe him. i might use words like liar, grasping, incompetent, corrupt, conceited to call some.

2016-09-30 03:48:52 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Iranian Prez.

Hell, my year old daughter could beat Bush in a debate.

2006-08-29 14:18:40 · answer #10 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 2 2

Why on EARTH would we dignify that Holocaust denier with such an elevated status as to debate with anyone other than Daffy Duck! He's a nut.

2006-08-29 14:17:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers