2006-08-29 12:37:23 · 16 answers · asked by itsallover 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no at all they are in the back pocket of the terrorist
2006-08-29 12:42:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Actually, Yes, The United Nations is a product of the Anglo American World Power, of course it is in favor of every thing the American/British Government demand! At least in theory.
One day soon how ever it will turn on the Anglo American World Power and Make it's own rules about power and religion, and then watch the world MOAN because religion is one of the main MONEY making powers in the Wold.
BUT JUST WAITE WHEN IT ATTACKS THE Catholic CHURCH AND OTHER FALSE CHRISTIANS RELIGIONS in the near future, Worlds will weep and Co lapse, but it will be too late!
2006-08-29 21:27:37 · answer #2 · answered by bugsie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reality check.
Where is the United Nations building/headquarters located?
Which country owes the UN a lot of money but refuses to pay because the UN is using this country's soil for it's headquarters?
If you can answer these two questions then your questions will also be answered.
Peace.
2006-08-29 19:48:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that United States are just too powerfull so that the United Nations can't do anything against them so they kinda don't have any choice but to be on their sides, even if a lot of countries aren't.
2006-08-29 19:43:40 · answer #4 · answered by simfr21 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The UN protects the interests of the UN. Think of it this way, if you were not doing a good job, would you go to your boss and tell that person that you should be fired? Probably not. The UN will be an albatross around our neck for a long time to come.
2006-08-29 19:45:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally think the United Nations is useless to any country.
2006-08-29 19:39:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not even close. More like they are anti-American and are pro terrorist. I say we quit giving them hundreds of billions of dollars every year and kick them out of the country and turn the U.N. building that we built and paid for into a place that cares for the elderly poor.
2006-08-29 19:43:22 · answer #7 · answered by celticwarrior7758 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Useless; UN-American!
2006-08-29 22:40:54 · answer #8 · answered by nardo84 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it's structure only benefits the permanent positions in the Security Council. There have been several resolutions to change this, but everytime it goes into votation, the permanent veto and with only one veto it doesn't passess. Besides that, Cofi Annan (sorry about spelling) isn't the best person to lead such an organization, my aunt says that he is in every party in E!(Entratainment Television).
Also the headquarters should not be in the U.S.A.
2006-08-29 19:39:39 · answer #9 · answered by let the speakers blow your mind 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The UN only protects nothing. It is as useless as **** on a boar hog. ( that's a male pig)
2006-08-29 19:51:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
th U N couldnt fight their way out of a wet paper bag
2006-08-29 19:40:50 · answer #11 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋