If/when America or Israel nukes Iran will you support it?

Question

America nukes Iran as a pre-empitve move - Good bad ?

Israel starts a war with Iran and then nukes them Good bad?

Israel nuke's Iran no warning no war first just a stike-good bad?

They need to back off Israel, because God isn't going to put with it much longer.

8 minutes ago

Then let god fight Iran- Israel and America can go on holiday right - I

That statement is just nuts

Answer 1

I am against any nuking of any kind. I do not support Israel or US in this. I would also not support Iran if they wanted to nuke Israel or the US.

Answer 2

Neither Israel or the US is likely to use "nukes" under any circumstances because they can not control the nuclear fall out. At some point it is very possible that either the US or Israel will bomb the facilities that the Iranians are using to develop "nukes". While some who post here make smart remarks and joke about these type issues and our leaders this is a real issue that may just determine the future of the world. Not since Hitler has there been an individual as likely to force the US into another world war as the present leader in Iran. But nukes are a bad idea unless they get and use them and we are ready to destroy most of that part of the world. The good news is that Iran would need to send a nuclear bomb by UPS if they wanted to get one to the US.

Answer 3

Isreal is watching, they have never been without a plan. If Iran developes their nukes and keep Ahmadinejad then there is a real reason why Israel should start pointing their nukes. The free world will not tolerate a pre-emtive strike. Why does everyone think Israel is so weak. Great people, best intelligence and they don't plan on being involved in another final solution. I would bet on it. Will th US stand behind them? Of course, along with the Brits, Aussie's, and, among others, probably most of the citizens in Iran. First strikes? Iran or bin laden will be the ones who do the first strike.

Answer 4

Probably bad. It is possible to take out the technology with conventional weapons.

It would be Iran starts a war with Israel, but none the less, if they want to use nukes, it's not so bad.

No warning? Well, militarily not the best idea but politically better. Then again, when one is dropping a nuke on another country being politically correct isn't possible.

Best fish question so far!

Answer 5

No one is going to nuke Iran. That is no one will unless Iran decides to nuke someone.
America or Israel may do a pre-empitve strike with conventional weapons but only if they see an eminent threat.

Answer 6

Bad, the threat does not yet warrant a nuclear strike. In the event that Iran becomes a credible nuclear threat than it is possible. I believe if Iran was as close to actual nuclear weapons they wouldn't speak as belligerent as they have. It appears to be a political ploy to reap as much as they can by these false threats. In the end, they will adhere to sanctions and inspections. Don't forget, Saddam reaped billions of dollars as a result of the sanctions. Oil for food was the largest economic scandal in history. Enron is a speck of lint in comparison.

Answer 7

Holy F man! Nukes suck in all respects. If we were ever to nuke another country, war would reign down on us like no tomorrow. Israel's a country that we should pull all funding from and see how well they can take care of themselves. They're practically another state of the U.S. with all the support we give them.

Answer 8

This question is ludicrous. Neither America or Israel would ever use nukes in a first strike scenario.

Answer 9

We would not nuke Iran. Israel would not nuke Iran. We have too many friends and troops in the vicinity to risk it. Iran knows it too. Check mate.

Answer 10

I could conceive of no possible justification for the use of nuclear weapons. All this Middle East war is being staged in order to start world war 3, and bring about the new world order police state.