The thing that i don't understand about this whole case is, they let him go because the dna didn't match, but in all of karrs statements he always said he was there when she died and is was an acciedent, but what if someone eles was there with him, that could be the other persons dna. When someone comes out and gives details like the ones he gave, the police even said that he gave details about the murder that were never relased to the public, he must have been there. Just because the dna doesn't match doesn't mean he wasn't there. What do you guys think about this whole case? Who ever was in charge really need to get there head out of there butt, because sending him back to the US, just got him off on the charges he was going to get in Thiland, and a free ride home!!!!!!
2006-08-29 11:02:52 · 9 answers · asked by yamahaviper_00 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
He is going to California to answer for the child porn that he was charged with and hopefully he will do time on that.
then someone in prison can make him there little girl.
2006-08-29 17:18:46 · answer #1 · answered by Jade S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Believe me, Karr was interrogated very thoroughly. If there was inkling that he was guilty he would have been held. And the notion that another person may have been there did not pass the authorities.
I believe the evidence doesn't show others involved. But DNA excused him. There you have it, so be it.
2006-08-29 18:13:10 · answer #2 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was proven that he wasn't even near the girl when she died. He is seriously ill, mentally, and I think he wanted to believe in his mind that he killed her. Even his handwriting didn't match the ransom note. I'm glad he wasn't found guilty because now Nancy Grace and all the other news people on TV have to find some other sick person to attack recklesly.
2006-08-29 18:08:07 · answer #3 · answered by Oguz Z 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were several witnesses that said he was in I think they said Alabama the night she was murdered. I think he is a sick man but he may not have been involved with THIS crime. He is being sent to California to face charges there for child pornography though.
2006-08-29 18:06:33 · answer #4 · answered by nsrush83 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know that man should be highly ashamed of himself. he is such a dumb person to do that. SHE WAS 6 years old, and he is a grown man and he should know much better than that then to around and be a pervert.
2006-08-29 18:15:25 · answer #5 · answered by Chelsea W 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It appears the " Police" have screwed this whole situation up since the beginning. Now they are grasping at anything and they are still screwing it up!
2006-08-29 18:47:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's not let off, theyve got him on other pornography charges in Cali! and well, you cant keep him for the murder when DNA proves he wasnt there and witnesses proved he wasnt even in the state when it happened.......
2006-08-29 18:08:41 · answer #7 · answered by Aussieblonde -bundy'd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didn't do it and almost everyone knew. DNA just proved it.
2006-08-29 18:05:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because he didn't kill her
2006-08-29 18:05:43 · answer #9 · answered by badotisthecat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋