2006-08-29 10:52:48 · 10 answers · asked by bigandra 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Because if there were two, it would rather defeat the object if they kept disagreeing. If they kept agreeing, then why have two when one would do?
2006-08-29 10:55:31 · answer #1 · answered by arwen4838 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you asking about the Parliamentary and Health Ombudsman, the Financial Services Ombudsman, the Local Government Ombudsman, the Ombudsman for Estate Agents, the Housing Ombudsman, the Pensions Protection Fund Ombudsman, the Telecommunications Ombudsman, the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, or one of the others?
2006-08-29 18:05:44 · answer #2 · answered by boracic1 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only one person can monitor the start of a buddist chant. (The man who monitors the budding of the om's)
2006-08-29 18:25:41 · answer #3 · answered by andegar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because there is only one Monopolies Commissioner
2006-08-29 17:57:22 · answer #4 · answered by your pete 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think this is true. Isn't there a different one for issues concerning law and another for government and another for trade?
2006-08-30 07:09:36 · answer #5 · answered by lykovetos 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only one guy could spell it.
2006-08-29 18:03:21 · answer #6 · answered by Sgt. VietnamVet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There isn't! Get your facts right.
2006-09-02 15:10:11 · answer #7 · answered by Pretorian 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is one more called omMILLERman
2006-08-29 17:57:45 · answer #8 · answered by lal 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because he is very good at his job
2006-08-29 17:56:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are many.
2006-08-29 18:20:07 · answer #10 · answered by deadly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋