President Bush was the best man for the job as opposed to Gore and Kerry. Obviously most of you felt the same when you voted him in for 2 consecutive terms. Now, all of you fair-weather fans are using Bush as a scapegoat for all domestic and international problems that are occuring. Every president who has had the honor to serve endured trials and tribulations during their canidacy- very few had to endure as much hardship as Bush has so give him some credit. There are so many people who have jumped on the "Hate Bush" bandwagon. First of all, it requires more than the President to run the country. Secondly, who is to say that a different President would have handled things any better or worse. Third, if you, the armchair politician have all the answers, why don't you run for office???? It is so easy to form a false hypothesis from the slanted media, but you really have no idea what it is like to run the country. It seems all you Bush haters can't even think for yourself. PATHETIC!
2006-08-29
10:38:16
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
WAKE UP!!!!!!!!
Don't you understand it has nothing to do with hating Bush. it has nothing to do republican or democrat. the elected officials are all one and the same. they are owned by the the big corporations. they are setting the country up for dissolution and people like you are so busy wanting to cry its just a bunch of cry baby democrats that are unhappy with the election. face it the republicans will lose this election and then it will be you and the rest of the republicans blaming the democrats. if the republicans don't lose control of one or both congress and the senate then there is no way any reasonable person can not know that the election was rigged. thing is it doesn't matter if they do though. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEMO-CRAP OR REPOOPICAN!!!
put down your party flag long enough to look at the available information with an objective eye and see that the people of this country are being raped by the people sworn to uphold and protect the constitution. the slanted media? funny how it doesn't matter what party is running the show they always claim the media is biased against them. are the American people as a whole really as stupid as the politicians seem to think we are. if we don't wake up it only a matter of time before there will be no US to even talk about. use the computer for something other than sending email to your friends and looking at porn. do some research and find out about such things as UN Agenda 21, the NAFTA Superhighway, REAL ID cards.... the list of things is endless it seems.
this stuff is happening right now people and they are the mechanisms that will be used to dismantle the UNITED STATES
if enough people wake up right f***ing now it might not be too late but I gotta tell you it aint looking good for the home team folks.
2006-08-29 11:05:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by atiredwing 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I did not vote for him, I live in Texas and know what a lousy job he did as governor. I haven't jumped on any bandwagon, I hated him long before most people knew who he was. Who would you like us to blame the current domestic and international conditions on? He is our commander in chief and as such he bares all responsibility for the decisions he makes on behalf of this country.
I do not blame him for everything, only for the things that he is responsible for. I blame him for the deaths of thousands in Iraq. Which is a war that we should not be fighting. Neither Iraq nor Sadam was ever a threat to us. They did not have WMD's, and they were not involved in the 9-11 attacks. The only 2 reasons we are there is because Bush Sr. was embarrassed by them during his presidency. Also, because Bush wanted their oil. If it were for humanitarian reasons as so many try to claim, the we would have troops in Darfur doing something about the genocide going on there.
If he were concerned about humanity it would not have taken our government so long to get the people of New Orleans out of the horrendous conditions they were in after hurricane Katrina. Bush should have been on top of things, getting those people out should have priority number 1 on his list. Instead, he's more interested in changing the constitution so that gay couples can't get married. Yeah, that's more important than saving thousands of people huh?
If he truly cares about the people of this country then why isn't he doing something about the illegal aliens that are here? He is wanting to give them all immunity and offer them citizenship.
Why hasn't he done anything at all to secure our borders? Do you really believe that we are ready to defend another attack on American soil? How can we be when the majority of our troops are in Iraq?
Why is gasoline $3.00 a gallon still when the oil industry is reporting record breaking profits?
Why has he broken the law to allow illegal wiretapping on telephone lines?
If he outlaws abortion have you given any thought as to what will happen to the millions of innocent babies that will be brought into this world that are unwanted? Our orphanages and foster care system is already overwhelmed. Not near enough homes for the unwanted children that are already here.
Who should we be blaming for these things if not President Bush?
2006-08-29 11:02:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
What unmitigated rubbish. If you knew anything about leadership, you would know that the first duty of any incumbent is to safeguard the state and the people within the state. Bush's foreign policy failures aside, we have a deficit that is running into the stratosphere, we have issues like Katrina, Medicare for the aged, and a UN..Patriotic Act that makes every living American live under suspicion. I suggest you reappraise your outlook and take off the rose tinted glasses.
2006-08-29 10:52:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
True. In fact, Kerry even said that he would have sent troops to Iraq himself, after what happened on 9-1-1. All of the statesmen have repeatedly said from the beginning, that it took 10 years to establish a democracy in Japan after WWII, so it could take a very long time to stabilize the situation in the Mideast as well.
Some people just don't like the President. But they should still be more respectful. If we can't show respect for our own President, how can we expect the rest of the world to have any respect for any of us? Would you have any respect for a family whose children badmouthed their own parents in public?
2006-08-29 10:46:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by mia2kl2002 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
Well, if everything is going to the Sh!ts, who should I blame?
As you said yourself, they elected him to represent the american people so he's the one accountable, for the good AND the bad.
Now, where's the good?
2006-08-29 10:46:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jmyooooh 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, let Dubya and his gang of mercenaries fill his pockets with money and lie to americans(sarcasm).
2006-08-29 12:01:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too much Al Franken and air America.
2006-08-29 10:51:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Homeland Security. Clinton didn't have the sence to think of that after NY had been attack many times by terrorists. All he had in mind was Jones, Lewinski, hummm... which one was best!
Hey surroundedbyflies.. If you hide criminals in your house, wont police bust your doors down, and arrest you for aiding and avaiding.
2006-08-29 11:02:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by weedeater 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
Some advice for bringing you up-to-date on current events:
Read anything with words on it.
2006-08-29 10:42:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by LatexSolarBeef 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well said and I agree. Bushs job would be easier if the filthy traitor liberals actually cared more for this nation than they do the terrorists.
2006-08-29 10:52:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋