English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Did he cheat or win fairly? Or did people not vote?

2006-08-29 10:26:29 · 28 answers · asked by Nme 1 in Politics & Government Politics

28 answers

It is not possible to say for nobody caught him cheating but nobody has proof he didn't. I may not be on his side but i doubt that he cheated. He is trying his best so we have to appreciate the good things he has done for our country. Who knows with Kerry this country might of got worse. My opinion is that he didn't cheat but i can not be sure. Everyone has a different opinion.

2006-08-29 10:51:21 · answer #1 · answered by swan 1 · 4 1

I think George Bush won a second term becasue he got more votes than his opponent.

But seriously, I think he won because people weren't confident enough that Kerry was going to lead this country well enough, and people wanted to see how Bush would finish what he started in Iraq.

2006-08-29 10:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by Max B 2 · 4 1

Gay marriage issue in Ohio.

He actually got the most votes in 2004 (compared to 2000). What's "fair" in presidential politics? The "swift-boating" of John Kerry and his record as a war hero was crossing the line (especially in support of candidates who never fought). Cheating? The GOP? Those are good Christian folks, I'm sure they'd never cheat. Since Bush got the most (electoral) votes, I guess it was fair.

2006-08-29 10:38:08 · answer #3 · answered by JB 3 · 1 1

Because enough sensible people realized he was the best man for the job from among the realistic choices.

Kerry/Edwards SUCKED.

The left wants you to believe it was cheating (like THEY tried to do in Florida in 2000 - only DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED precincts had significant statistical problems) and that there were class and race issues involved - their tactics are to introduce class, race and other forms of envy & anger to get you to act emotionally, not logically & rationally. THINK FOR YOURSELF. Do not let the left goad you into being an idiotic automaton. Funny how they claim the right does that when it's obvious they do.

Idiots like Melvin100 would have us believe our votes don't count. Well I do hope they continue to convince leftists of this because that way less leftists will waste their time & effort voting and the left will lose what little power they retain as their idiot leaders get more and more shrill & ridiculous in their claims.

If you want a glimpse of what life will be like with the left in charge you only have to look to New Orleans, Louisiana pre and post Katrina. There was an evacuation plan where even the poorest of the poor would be bussed out of danger on public busses. DEMOCRATS like Nagin (Mayor of NO) and BLANCO the GOVERNOR of the state chose NOT to imlement them and even worse they impeded the federal efforts to help after the storm passed THEN BLAMED THE FEDS FOR BEING SLOW WHEN IT WAS THEIR FAULT!

As a matter of fact, your question "Or did people not vote" suggests how out of touch you are. More people voted in the 2004 presidential election than any other election ever. In fact, in many heavy democratic counties convicted felons who are legally not allowed to vote still voted for Kerry, the dead apparently rose from the grave and voted for Kerry, and nursing homes full of Alzheimer patients who cannot even remember their own names nor the names of their kids voted for Kerry. In some counties people went from polling place to polling place to make sure they voted multiple times for Kerry. Despite all this blatant election fraud by the left, BUSH STILL WON!!!! What does THAT tell you?

2006-08-29 10:32:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

That election was a coin toss...

To quote Louis Black:
"That election was like having your choice between two bowls of SH!T"

2000 on the other hand was definitely a fixer, but Gore was advised of the impending economic melt down and just let Bush have it with little or no fuss.

2006-08-29 10:43:48 · answer #5 · answered by Bush Whacker 3 · 0 2

There ought to were no Clinton Surplus in 2001 for Republicans to tout as justification for passing the worst tax cuts in the historic previous of the U. S. ensuing in the large deficits that are with us immediately.

2016-11-23 13:23:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The second election wasn't even close. It was the first election that held all of the speculation. Bush won because of a strong force in America today called the Christian Right. Yah I'm one of them!

2006-08-29 10:33:38 · answer #7 · answered by bartathalon 3 · 2 2

He won because he was far the best man.

He won even though there was hundreds of thousands of crooked Democrat votes in Chicago, St. Louis, and many other cities for Kerry. Bush won easily, anyway.

Democrats motto: "Vote early. Vote often".

2006-08-29 10:38:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

He didn't just win, he kicked butt. Clinton never even won the Popular vote, Bush did!

2006-08-29 10:33:20 · answer #9 · answered by dlil 4 · 2 3

Would you have prefered Herman Ketchup to Monkey boy,..? Bush is fun Kerry was ..well Grey...

2006-08-29 10:51:53 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers