English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

From the journey there to life sustainment, and is it most logical as of now, excluding future advancements in science and technology, but as of now do you agree it is the only realistic option?

2006-08-29 09:55:07 · 4 answers · asked by Rock Skull 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

4 answers

Just like life began on Earth millenia ago. We have the technology to put a civilisation there ,sort of stop between the travel to other planets. I believe man is capable , our ancestors did it and we can too, iam just sad it will not be in my time ,so that Imcould go.

2006-08-29 10:16:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Rock Skull, I'm pretty sure, when they find a way to thru the Van Allen belts!!! This radiation feilds fry anything that goes through it, thats why The King does NOT believe in Moon Landings!!

Why Russia has not gone, because we beat em!?!? Yeah Right!!
How the Asians, nope,..does this question NASA abilities, yep!!

2006-08-29 17:19:50 · answer #2 · answered by The King 6 · 0 0

I think we'd colonize Mars before the moon. One thing needed is a large supply of water. Making breathable air, water for plants, & people, machinery... We would have to take tons of water with us to the moon, & a very high cost. We would need a planet with ice that could be melted & distilled, for all of these reasons.

2006-08-29 18:36:38 · answer #3 · answered by Koklor 2 · 0 0

Biospheres on the Moon or Mars may be our only salvation as a species; avoiding the meteorites will be a challenge.

2006-08-30 01:51:55 · answer #4 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers