Because they want to own you...when I got married I kept my maiden name....and It will stay that way....
2006-08-29 09:46:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by ERICKSMAMA 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
I am wondering what makes him think he has the right to LET her do anything!! He isn't buying property or a puppy, she is an equal human being, if the issue is about LETTING her he doesn't see it that way so my question becomes why would she even consider tolerating being treated that way and/or marrying someone who is acting like he's buying a blow up doll? If you want to hyphenate your name just tell him that is the way it will be and thats all there is to it, you do NOT want to even start behaving this way, unless of course you eventually want him deciding whether he's going to LET you work, shower, eat, speak, etc. This is not so much about the issue as his attitude about it...it is an indication of his character, his beliefs that he is more than you, that he has the right to LET you do anything and you should be very, very concerned about starting a life with someone like that.
2006-08-29 09:56:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by dappersmom 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I had the same issue, I decided to hyphenate my laste name. My husband says it is a Mexican tradition that the bride/wife has the husband's laste name. I love my laste name and in honor of my family "tree" I decided to keep it. There is nothing wrong with it, it is the new milleniom and that is what most women are doing. Oh, and I also have my last name hyphenated with my husband's last name to my son's name. Hope I didn't confuse you :)
2006-08-29 10:02:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by blu2u1982 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm a woman and I can honestly say I have no idea why this should be an issue in the first place. Take his name! I don't see what the big deal about it is. I think women keeping there last names are 1) A little too feminist and 2) Making their kids life a living hell by making them learn to write TWO last names when they should just be learning how to write one. Losing your last name doesn't mean you are losing your identity...Seriously!
2006-08-29 09:51:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brea1243 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Speaking as a child whose mother did this, I can say it makes the child wonder who the heck they really are and why their name is different than their mother. It creates a real identity crisis. I think from the mans point of view it's evidence that you haven't truely accepted them as the traditional husband and see yourself more as a domestic partner. Not that there is anything wrong with domestic partners but it implies less intimacy and more seperateness.
2006-08-29 12:33:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by thom 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I just believe that wives should leave their father and cling to their husband. It is stated in the bible numerous times. The name change symbolizes that(previous family name to husband's name). Leaving your old name kind of symbolizes that you are not totaling letting go and becoming that "one flesh" that is talked about in the bible.
2006-08-29 09:49:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Confused 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why do you want to hyphenate your name?
And why use the word "let"? You are obviously seeking permission... why not simply take his name? Is your father more important to you than your husband?????
2006-08-29 09:46:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think that if you love him enough to marry him, you should take his name and drop yours, if it was meant to be hyphenated then it would have been that way from the beginning... just my thoughts though
2006-08-29 09:48:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Just Me 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think because its traditional, we want the family name to carry on. I'm not sure if its completely fair, or if its something that is quaint and shouldn't be done anymore, but I don't see it going away anytime soon. Then again, my girlfriend says I'm taking her last name, so....
2006-08-29 09:47:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by SillyBilly 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I actual do not recognize. i'm surprised at what percentage Christians say we do not comprehend our own faith. They counter with "Jesus turned right into a Jew" as although that explains all of it. we do not imagine about Jesus. We did not a lot reject him as in basic terms not settle for him. there's a large difference. Our faith isn't one in all hating Jesus. that's one in all honoring Torah and residing as G-d commanded. Christianity honors Jesus. i actual had someone once tell me they theory Pesach changed into the party of Jews killing Jesus. for sure, they could not clarify why then he changed into in Jerusalem to celebrate Pesach on the time he changed into killed. Many are completely confident that a deep hatred and denial of Jesus lies on the inspiration of Judaism. not something must be added from the reality. we do not hate or deny Jesus. he's in basic terms inconsequential. we do not get this from Muslims. they don't declare our faith centers round denying Mohamed. we do not get it from Buddhists. it type of feels to stem from the very incontrovertible reality that Jesus turned right into a Jew and therefore, we are rejecting Jesus and our faith centers round it. OY! that's the deadly mixture of vanity and shortage of expertise. by using the way, Jesus fulfilled NO Torah prophesy. The Torah is Jewish. The OT is a mistranslation of the Torah. perhaps in that version he fulfilled something. i don't recognize. i recognize you won't be able to be a Jew and Christian mutually. EDIT: by using dad (a Rabbi) and that i have been in basic terms speaking about this as I responded this. He suggested that the problem is they imagine all of us recognize he's the Messiah yet deny him besides. We "recognize the reality" yet deny it. The Christian translation is so basically diverse than the Torah/Tanakh that they extremely have self assurance we've Jesus in the Torah and yet we opt for to deny him. intending to many, we are more beneficial "accountable" than someone who in no way knew Jesus or is listening to about him for the first time and laughs. We were the "keepers" of the Torah until eventually Jesus got here (in accordance to Christian custom) and Jesus is "obviously suggested in the Torah" and therefore all of us recognize the reality and outright reject it. He also suggested that because of wording of the Christian Bible that's troublesome ot make a dent in that mind-set. enable me state back for list, Jesus is irrelevant in Judaism. He did not fufill prophesy. he's not suggested in the Torah. The Messiah is yet to go back and the Messiah will be a guy of flesh and blood. not G-d or the son of G-d or a spirit being.
2016-11-23 13:19:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because you are wanting to be an "individual" inside of a partnership. I think that you should really think about why you are wanting to keep your "name". for some reason I would bet the ranch that you are a feminist.
2006-08-29 10:20:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by 57chevy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋