2006-08-29 09:21:25 · 15 answers · asked by ZEUS! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
people say they will never get ur guns .... but in another disaster if martial law was declared ... house to house searches could be done and it would be extremely difficult to organize any resistance ... especially if transportation and fuel were cut off ... have u ever been through an area sealed off after a hurricane? ... from ur cold dead hands may be easier for them to accomplish than most people like to think.
2006-08-29 09:34:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Ban weapons and much less human beings will die. what's the factor of having a real if it potential having the prospect to kill human beings is a result?" Banning weapons does no longer recommend fewer deaths - information do no longer help your fact. risk? considering while does risk equivalent motive or overt action? in case you lack that plenty own duty then you definately do no longer pick a gun - you won't be in a position to be depended on. "cause them to much less obtainable and the criminals won't have such ease of get admission to to those deadly weapons." If this have been genuine, Chicago might desire to be the main secure place in u . s . of america, as they have measureably those maximum restrictive gun administration interior the U. S..
2016-11-06 01:18:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 2nd amendment of the Constitution has already been unlawfully overthrown by the US Government with over 50,000 gun laws abridging our right to keep and bear arms. Any American who still believes they are free is sleep-walking.
2006-08-29 09:27:34 · answer #3 · answered by Paladin 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you guys all short of a few marbles??? It would be about time the US of A joined the ranks of civilized nations where the state has a monopoly on violence (theoretically) used on behalf of the common good.
2006-08-29 09:36:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've been hearing this "no guns allowed" fear mongering for over 50 years.
I guess "soon" is a relative concept.
I hear the world will also end "soon." Again.
2006-08-29 09:32:20 · answer #5 · answered by Vince M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the government is doing it's best to take away ALL of our rights, and if they think, they are going to disarm America w/all the terrorist threats going on. Not happening, someone has to defend this country, while Bush has our men dieing overseas.
2006-08-29 09:31:29 · answer #6 · answered by spiritwalker 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What has FEMA to do with firearms? This post is just nuts.
2006-08-29 10:35:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, you don't know what you are talking about.
George needs to declare himself king and dictator before that could happen.
2006-08-29 09:25:44 · answer #8 · answered by emperor_chino 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you really think the dummicrats can win in this country with no policy
2006-08-29 09:25:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
-
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."
- Ronald Reagan
2006-08-29 09:27:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋