what's the market size of global publishing industry?

Answer 1

It's actually quite big in a monopolized sort of way. The intricate planning and divestation of ssuch industries usually calls for a keen appetitie.

Answer 2

Ebeth, I see you're getting some solid responses in this positioned up. i'm hoping you will no longer basically %. and decide what to believe, yet i might recommend looking into the validity of people who disagree with you (and not basically on skeptic blogs). maximum of what you have written above is the two spin or nonsense. The GWP (Oregon Petition) grew to become into chilly-mailed to hundreds of hundreds of scientists interior the rustic (in all probability thousands and thousands), it grew to become into despatched with a phony "peer reviewed" skeptic article, despatched by using a guy whose previous job grew to become into to shield the tobacco industry (Frederick Seitz), it did no longer declare that AGW wasn't actual (it mentioned issues like Kyoto have been a bad concept and that AGW does no longer reason CATASTROPHIC heating), and almost all of the signatories weren't climate scientists (approximately 4,000 have been). The "extra CO2 in the time of an Ice Age" factoid is in all probability genuine. those measurements have been from over 4 hundred million years in the past, and it truly is not as possible to get precise sampling that a procedures back as is the previous a million/2 million years with ice center sampling. There are solid warning indications that CO2 levels dropped as because of the Ice Age in this era. yet genuine, it does look CO2 levels have been very intense in the process the overdue Ordovician (a prior ice age). technology does not declare that CO2 is the only mover of climate substitute (or maybe the well-known mover). It does declare that CO2 is the well-known mover in transformations we are seeing NOW - it truly is a extensive distinction. What got here approximately interior the previous isn't inevitably a hallmark of what's occurring now. right here is the argument among skeptics. we will not locate CO2 strengthen because of the fact the well-known mover of temperature strengthen interior the previous (even if there are solid warning indications that it grew to become into an amplifier). yet guy wasn't pouring out over 20 gigatons of CO2 each 12 months for close to one hundred years interior the previous. there's no direct corollary. I won't touch on Crichton different than to assert we even have not got dinosaur parks.

Answer 3

billions of dollars