i support him fully.
2006-08-29 08:35:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by frederickpuddles 2
·
2⤊
8⤋
He's not better than Gore, that is for sure. However, I left the party after the John Kerry came into the race. Kerry never deserved to be President and look what we have to show for the Democratic screw-up of selecting him as a nominee. Kerry couldn't make a decision to save his own life.
I'm sick and tired of the Democratic Party not being able to make a stead-fast decision that doesn't sound wishy-washy and leave this country in the same boat that it sits in today. They don't stay on with a message, a solution or even one single good idea. That party has left the people to sit through this war and they can't even make a statement whether they want to be in the war or out of the war. The democratic party needs to centralize its policy instead of having a bunch of loudmouths go out and spew their own take on what should happen. With out a single message that is better than the Republican Party's message, the Democrats will never win and they don't deserve a win.
And another thing, Hillary Clinton is a moron that should never be nominated to run for President. My opinion in this matter is based strictly on her lack of knowledge of how our economy works.
2006-08-29 08:41:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are 2 types of people in this world. Those who support Bush and those who, in the future, will recognize they should have supported Bush.
Some people will take many years before seeing the light. Some will even die before they get the chance to see it. However, one day all will see that Bush was the best choice for the USA during this time in history.
The person who gave me thumbs down will be one of the last ones to see the light.
2006-08-29 08:42:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Didn't vote for him, I am pissed with both parties. In '04, Kerry for Pres was like putting an able person in the Special Olyimpics. It was for the Democrats to loose..and they did.
What gets me is all these soccer moms and neo-cons with their "Support Our Troops" stickers on their gas-sucking SUV's, when they never have served a day in their retched lives. As a former Solider you loose all credability when you when you dictate what is best for our military and have no experience.
2006-08-29 08:59:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steve G 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gore would've blamed the Large Airline Industries and SUV's for the 911 attacks.
Kerry would've voted against retaliation before voting for retaliation.
Hey Liberal, pull your head out of your behind, and be grateful that your not having to learn a new religion and language.
THANK YOU GEORGE W. BUSH FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP!!!!!!
2006-08-29 08:53:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Conservative 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, he IS better than Gore or Kerry. Period.
He's far from perfect, but he was better than the alternatives. I don't support all his policies, some I openly oppose, but he is very strong (and correct) on his foreign policy and the War against terrorists.
And that's how it is. Regardless of your fantasies about Gore, Kerry and Democrats.
2006-08-29 08:47:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
First off, Bush hasn't given me, or anyone else any reason to distrust him. He's done a good job on the war on terror. I personally think that all illegal "immigrants" aka criminals should be kicked out, and our borders shut completely, and feel that Bush should of let Israel finish the cowardly, terrorists Hezbos off, but other than that, I like Bush. Al Gore. That guy tried to recount, and recount, and make up votes, tried to sue his way into office. John Kerry. Any man that couldn't be faithful, that would lie on his fellow soldiers, to me isn't fit to breath air. Not to mention, he's an admitted war criminal. That's what we were thinking, Libby.
2006-08-29 08:42:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by K S 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
i would have voted for satan to keep gore/kerry out of office because they were gun grabbers .......i'll bet you a million dollars if not for your candidates stance on gun control they woulda won....... lololololol as you can tell by my name i took the assaultwpn ban real hard & i hated clinton as much as you hate bush & i speculate if your guys woulda won & started takin more guns from the people we would be lookin at a different kind of war... i only voted for bush on 1 issue gun control but i think hes done a way better job than any pansy liberal coulda....i think bush is a good ol boy .....dont mess with texas lol
2006-08-29 09:09:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by assaultwpn 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am not sure either because I didn't vote for the A** in the beginning. I sure wish others out there would have voted for Al Gore.
2006-08-29 08:36:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by lady_bug418 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because cons are a "special people".
YOU ARE A SPECIAL PEOPLE CONS
You supported bush, but in time, you will come to
realize how he targeted you for deception.
You were specially picked because of the attributes
you possess: fear, ignorance, arrogance, belligerence,
bigotry, and low self-esteem. Bush's political
strategists calculated that the people most easily
misled and controlled are the ones who fit your
profile, so they crafted their propaganda just for
you.
He got your support by making you feel better about
your personal flaws. He told you to wave the flag
because your bigotry is nothing be ashamed of, and to
thump the bible because your ignorance is a virtue.
You should cherish your hatefulness and
small-mindedness as they are family values. You are
not society's rejects, but rather, you are higher on
the ladder than certain other people. Right-wing radio
points them out so that you know who to hate to feel
better about yourself.
He feeds you crap about "imminent threat",
"patriotism", "spreading freedom", and "flowers and
candy". He's only tossing you a bone because he knows
he's going to be asking you for a hefty sacrifice
soon. He repeats meaningless, mind-numbing platitudes
like "Freedom is not free!" and "We're fighting them
there so we don't have to fight them here!" You fell
for it.
By now, it should be apparent that the invasion of
Iraq was a shameless oil grab. We're there because the
rich, powerful, and greedy of this country, people who
you have nothing to do with, want to control that part
of the world's oil resources for decades to come, and
they're using your tax dollars and your children's
blood to do it. Over a hundred thousand people,
American and Iraqi, are dead because of it, and the
depleted uranium left behind will ensure that tens of
thousands more die afterwards. You call that
liberation? Not even that many people died when Saddam
Hussein tried to grab Kuwait's oil fields years ago.
Yes, you are a special people, cons. You do not
possess patriotism, a love of America, or any of those
high-minded ideals as you would like to believe. You
possess the qualities that allowed bush to hijack your
free will to do his bidding. You were used, and he did
it by playing to the personal shortcomings that most
people try to hide. Like Samuel L. Jackson's character
at the end of the movie Unbreakable, you become aware,
only after the fact, of the disgraceful role that you
were destined to play. You will come to realize that
you are history's bad guy. Like the McCarthyites or
the brownshirts, you will serve both as a symbol of
shame and a warning to future generations. You truly
are a special people.GOD HELP US ALL,AND AMERICA.
2006-08-29 08:35:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by parshooter 5
·
9⤊
2⤋
I think he is better, yes, he has just mishandled the Iraq war. Al Gore and John Kerry seem too superfical to be concerned about the needs of the US.
2006-08-29 08:37:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Midwest guy 4
·
1⤊
4⤋