2006-08-29 07:42:16 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, but only if it a failure as a hurricane.
2006-08-29 07:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by parshooter 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I thought the name was already taken by the hurricane that came through in 2000.
2006-08-29 07:48:13 · answer #2 · answered by Mandi 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The next hurricane is named "Killalib".
2006-08-29 07:48:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No hurricane could ever do as much damage as W has.
2006-08-29 07:48:29 · answer #4 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Experience shows that the use of short, distinctive given names in written as well as spoken communications is quicker and less subject to error than the older more cumbersome latitude-longitude identification methods. These advantages are especially important in exchanging detailed storm information between hundreds of widely scattered stations, coastal bases, and ships at sea.
Dubya might work.
2006-08-29 07:45:41 · answer #5 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think that ONE thing Named George W is one thing too many as it is...
*shudders*
2006-08-29 07:47:40 · answer #6 · answered by gobblygoo 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Ha! Ha! Ha!
Good one! I've never thought of it :D
2006-08-29 07:45:47 · answer #7 · answered by Lyvy 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Good one. Or just "W."
2006-08-29 07:49:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, he's done enough damage..............
2006-08-29 07:47:03 · answer #9 · answered by carpediem 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
umm...sure why not.
2006-08-29 07:46:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋