http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/08/29/iran.nuclear/index.html
2006-08-29 06:32:16 · 21 answers · asked by Nicholas C 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is sad to say, but Bush has no chance at all in any debate. Debates require critical thinking - enough said.
2006-08-29 06:39:57 · answer #1 · answered by strider89406 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I pronounced the Iranian president on 60 minutes a pair of weeks interior the previous - he's amazingly eloquent and a severe psychological. Bush does no longer stand a possibility against him and can do his usual tactic of fixing the problem and not in all possibility giving an answer to the question. you already comprehend - the comparable tactic all politicians use those days. i ask your self no count if or no longer they are taught this tactic at college? the guy who pronounced Elmer Fudd grow to be suitable on the money.
2016-10-01 01:21:41 · answer #2 · answered by ridder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The would be like watching Yosimite Sam debate Elmer Fudd, lots of yelling and spitting going on with very little real content.
2006-08-29 06:39:45 · answer #3 · answered by Big Ed 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I saw the Iranian president on 60 Minutes a couple of weeks ago - he is very eloquent and a serious intellectual.
Bush would not stand a chance against him and would do his usual tactic of changing the subject and not really giving an answer to the question. You know - the same tactic all politicians use nowadays. I wonder if they are taught this tactic in school?
The person who mentioned Elmer Fudd was right on the money.
2006-08-29 06:41:21 · answer #4 · answered by Special Ed 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Elmer Fudd would win in a debate with George W. Bush.
2006-08-29 06:35:13 · answer #5 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Excrement would win a debate against Bush. Our puppertdent is the laughing stock of the world. Of course he won't debate Ahmadinejad, he just hasn't got the balls.
2006-08-29 06:38:00 · answer #6 · answered by The answer man 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
President Ahmeadinejad... unfortunately.
Bush would be made to look like a fool, that would be the whole point of the debate.... With Bush looking like a fool more people would rally against him.
2006-08-29 06:37:42 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Homer Simpson.
2006-08-29 06:39:54 · answer #8 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
A lot would depend on who is judging the debate and what language it is being used. I would rather see them duke it out.
The problem is that most wars are not fought by those that start them
2006-08-29 06:48:59 · answer #9 · answered by Info_Please 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i don't know much about the iranian president but i'm pretty sure Bush would lose. he's a terrible speaker, so i don't think he would do well in a debate.
2006-08-29 06:37:50 · answer #10 · answered by Niecy 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋