2006-08-29 06:13:12 · 15 answers · asked by W E J 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
give pardons to all terrorist!!
2006-08-29 06:18:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋
placing a optimal salary for executives is incorrect because it receives rid of the american dream and questioning huge. It tells marketers who take risks in commencing organization, that their risks will in ordinary words be rewarded a lot. per chance I have an concept to invent a purifier, extra eco-friendly widget. This widget will revolutionize the widget marketplace and that i'll open plant life to manufature the widget, hence growing jobs in the course of the entire united states of america. As human beings purchase the widget, my employer makes a earnings, and that i too earnings because it became my concept, because I dreamt huge. even with the undeniable fact that, if advised that i'm in ordinary words allowed to make X volume of money, then why could I invent the widget contained in the first position? something like this would have the skill to get rid of competion in u . s . of america, hence eliminating many advancements to latest contraptions immediately, and we may finally end up in a era of no or little discoveries. This ultimately may bring about a distinct "darkish a lengthy time period" ephoc in heritage the position mankind is stagnet and human progression is null. If bill Gates became advised that he could in ordinary words make $500,000 (or perhaps with the proposed cap is) would he and Microsoft, have invented living house windows? MS living house windows (even even with the undeniable fact that overvalued and over hyped) has revolutionalized the computing gadget. with out it, the computing gadget would not exist as all of us understand it immediately. If bill Gates knew he would in ordinary words make a lot money, then be constrained to in ordinary words that volume, he may not have pushed a lot to get his concepts through.
2016-12-05 21:42:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ditto Putt.
I'll even say it again its that good:
To investigate the events leading up to 9/11,when boy-george was on vacation at his ranch when he was notified that Osama intended to hijack planes & fly them into buildings & took no action whatsoever! Then of course there's the pack of filthy lies,pushed mostly by the most infamous DRAFT-DODGER/WAR-MONGER of all history,nutless cheney,to blame Saddam for 9/11 as an excuse to invade oil-rich Iraq & shore up the military-industrial complex to keep their heavy contributions coming to the republicans!
2006-08-29 06:34:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
To investigate the events leading up to 9/11,when boy-george was on vacation at his ranch when he was notified that Osama intended to hijack planes & fly them into buildings & took no action whatsoever! Then of course there's the pack of filthy lies,pushed mostly by the most infamous DRAFT-DODGER/WAR-MONGER of all history,nutless cheney,to blame Saddam for 9/11 as an excuse to invade oil-rich Iraq & shore up the military-industrial complex to keep their heavy contributions coming to the republicans!
2006-08-29 06:31:13 · answer #4 · answered by Putt 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Stand up in front of the rest of the world and say....we got it wrong....we are now finally going to get an international coalition to tackle the underlying causes of terrorism. That is the only 'war' that is winnable.
2006-08-29 06:29:09 · answer #5 · answered by aap36rob 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Pardon the entire Bush cabinet.
2006-08-29 08:39:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying a democrat will win the presidency in the next election?
Who knows?????
2006-08-29 07:18:31 · answer #7 · answered by Bad M 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The only demoncrats I know are republicans. So I guess he would take a long vacation and ignore warnings about terrorist attacks like Bush did.
2006-08-29 06:23:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Bring home the troops from Iraq, it's obvious Bush isn't going to do it any sooner.
2006-08-29 06:55:32 · answer #9 · answered by carpediem 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
To legalize gay marriage so you can finally be happy. Dude, it's ok to admit it. I think you're just confused about your feelings and are lashing out as a result. I saw someone else say "Often, we are what we fear". You rail against liberalism and all of what you say it stands for but, one of the definitions of liberal is "generous". Do you hate the idea of being generous in thought and action? Are you stingy?
2006-08-29 06:22:53 · answer #10 · answered by Klawed Klawson 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Offer expatriation to the current regime instead of letting them serve out the rest of their sentences for crimes against humanity.
2006-08-29 06:23:08 · answer #11 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋