"Ahmadinejad defiant, challenges Bush to TV debate"
here's the story: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/29082006/6/n-usa-ahmadinejad-defiant-challenges-bush-tv-debate.html
2006-08-29 06:10:38 · 9 answers · asked by MAC 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think Bush is a president who has a lot of good qualities, but debating is not one of them. Have you heard the speeches he writes, they sound like 3rd grade book reports. (John Roberts is a gentleman. He was born in blah, blah, blah. He was the son of a blah, blah, blah. It's all basic sentences with no pizzazz). Now he is good with other people's speeches, he knows how to put emotion in there and does it very well. But then he gets to the Q&A section of his talks and screws it up again, because he can't think very well on his feet.
Ahmadenijad on the other hand is an amazing speaker. He has passion and an intelligence that you'd be hardpressed to find anyone who can match him anywhere in the world. A debate between the two of them will completely embarass Bush (whether he is right or not is irrelavent, since he is practically incapable of getting his ideas across) and make Ahmadenijad look like the most capable statesman and diplomat (and obviously debater) in world history. A TV debate is the worst idea Bush could take up right now.
2006-08-29 06:21:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have yet to see one debate that Bush has participated in that did not result in him looking like a confused child. I think Nader would have buried him, had they debated. Sad, really.
2006-08-29 13:34:58 · answer #2 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What could possibly be the upside for President Bush?
2006-08-29 13:14:22 · answer #3 · answered by jb_cpq 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush would be embrassed becasue the iranian prez speaks better english.
2006-08-29 13:13:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
In your short lifetime have you ever seen or heard of two heads of state "debating" each other?
2006-08-29 13:13:46 · answer #5 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the Iranian President is an idiot.
2006-08-29 13:12:57 · answer #6 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
debate or not debate that means nothing ,while they debate the n. bomb will be ready soon, it seemes they need to keep middle east in trouble.
2006-08-29 14:11:58 · answer #7 · answered by Satisfiedmom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would he even entertain that notion? I would rather see him take a vacation than see him pay any attention to that ......freaky deaky "PERSION" *******!
2006-08-29 13:16:44 · answer #8 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
US doesnt negotiate with Terrorist led/financed nations.
2006-08-29 13:16:37 · answer #9 · answered by nerdboy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋