at now that there is no white house connection, the media has just dropped the story. Why is this not all over the news? Oh yeah that's right because it's not a story that damages Bush so much anymore.
Any thoughts?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20060827/cm_thenation/3116488_1
2006-08-29 05:09:19 · 8 answers · asked by jasonzbtzl 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
plus_fute - Your response is exactly my point. The media never wants to show, hey the president is not as bad as all the libs say, but when they get a chance to align with the Bush hating they jump all over it.
2006-08-29 05:21:57 · update #1
Schmorgen - Clinton was convicted of PURJURY, which he committed when he lied on the stand in a sexual harrassment case. Nobody really cares if he diddles an intern. Why is it ok for Clinton lie to America, but Bush, even if not proven, is Satan and lies?
Double Standard crap and you know it.
2006-08-29 06:40:45 · update #2
you must be talking about whatshername , the C.I.A, broad !
Actually ,outed by a LIBERAL journalist .
How sweet is the truth ?
How expensive the lie ?
Will all the politicians and journalisrs who pushed this lie, please open your wallets and pay back the American Tax Payer ?
2006-08-29 05:40:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So let me get this straight... just so I know how the game works, what's fair and what isn't and what's newsworthy and what isn't:
ahem:
It's okay and perfectly just to chase around a baseless story about a land deal with a special prosecutor for years, finally resulting in the impeachment of a sitting president for the high crime of ejaculation which, to an outsider like myself, seems pretty unrelated to the land deal that the prosecutor was appointed to investigate. That's cool.
It's bad to track down someone who outed an undercover CIA agent and compromised her work and everyone ever seen with her who is still in the field. That's partasan attack.
It should damage Bush that someone in his cabinet is revealing state secrets. It should embarass the hell out of him, if he has any sense of shame. But we have seen this week, as he walks through the shell of New Orleans that he vowed to return to its previous glory that he has no shame.
2006-08-29 12:33:23 · answer #2 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's The Scandal That Never Was. I bet the liberals are regrouping to decide how to prove that Karl Rove planted the Newsweek story.
2006-08-29 12:21:32 · answer #3 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
what do you mean no connection.... He was Powells number two. Both carry water for Bush and Cheney (case in point Powells lying UN presentation about the weapon trucks)
2006-08-29 12:18:02 · answer #4 · answered by shazam 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That was yesterday's news. People are engrossed with the Katrina anniversary today. Tomorrow...who knows.
2006-08-29 12:15:17 · answer #5 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Amen schmorgen!
2006-08-29 13:05:35 · answer #6 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I heard about this on Fox News yesterday. I seriously doubt that if I watched another channel that I would have even heard about it.
2006-08-29 12:15:03 · answer #7 · answered by sethle99 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
its not news worthy is Bush didnt do it
2006-08-29 12:14:19 · answer #8 · answered by W E J 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋