Why does a married person get more tax breaks than a single person?

Question

That seems like discrimination.

Answer 1

yes, & it is...

Answer 2

It is technically discrimination. But so are many things that are legal.

And it's not a married person that gets more tax breaks, it's a married couple filing jointly. If both file separately, they usually pay the same tax as anyone else filing singly.

The joint tax reduction is based on the idea that the married couple is sharing one or more income streams, and that as a result each individual may be earning less than they would singly. So, the couple gets an additional tax break to offset the potential lost income.

It's effectively a govt subsidy or incentive for being married. One of thousands.

Answer 3

Until just recently, two-income married couples had to pay higher taxes than they paid as separate individuals, a perfect example of the stunning hypocrisy of our "family values" government. It was better to just live together without being married than to pay a tax penalty. If they're getting a break now I don't think it's necessarily wrong. Married couples with children have a lot more expenses than singles have. Ideally, being married should be no better or worse financially than being single, but there are a lot of variables involved. Sometimes it's a no-win situation. Someone is always going to feel like a victim of discrimination.

Answer 4

Others have stated it as well or extra constructive as i am going to say it. certain, this is honest. If something the consequences hostile to a married couple the position both are operating is bigoted to married couples. That stated, i'd favor to ensure the entire modern earnings tax eliminated in choose of a fee further tax on intake really than earnings, or per chance a flat earnings tax the position all would pay a similar percentage of their earnings. we may enable some constrained exemptions for dependents, yet not something else. very nearly any element will be fairer than the monstrosity we are now stressed with. I stay in a state which does not have a state earnings tax (Texas) and whose sales relies upon on resources and sales taxes. between the justifications I stayed the following became because of no state earnings tax. The state I lived in years in the past is a appealing state, yet i am going to't manage their state earnings taxes.

Answer 5

It is, against single people in general and Men in particular, Married people with children obviously use more resources and every single person I know contributes as much if not more to the economy than married, Singles need homes, cars and food also any other conclusion would require that you suspend logic and common sense.
Despite all the Government does to subsidize marriage at the expense of singles Marriage and so called family values are becoming more non existent than ever.

Men realizing there is little financial benefit to marriage no longer have any desire to do so!

Answer 6

That was not the case about 10 years ago it actually cost married couples more in taxes than single people. The reason they changed taxes for married couples because believe it or not they contribute more to the economy than a single person. They are more likely to buy a bigger home, spend more on groceries, invest more, and they also are more likely to have more than one child and continue the population.

Answer 7

What are you smoking? When I got married I was shocked at what happened to me at tax time.

Answer 8

Tax breaks are barely noticable unless you are a corporation!

Answer 9

That is absolutely not true.

Name one benefit that we get that you do not.

BP