2006-08-29 04:42:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They continue to cling to their other false charges. They even get fancy by referring to laws, but in the end, those are more fantasy than fact.
They're just trying to justify and rationalize their attempt to overturn the election.
2006-08-29 04:55:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of Bush/Cheney? Willful violation of federal laws.
Bush has publicly admitted to willfully violating federal laws, including his warrantless wiretapping program (18 USC 2511) in violation of FISA (50 USC 1801 et seq), as well as commission of war crimes under federal law (18 USC 2441). Beyond his public admissions, these have been confirmed by federal courts, including the Supreme Court in the later case.
Public admissions by Bush, plus Supreme Court findings, what more do people need before they consider a fact proven?
Article II Section 4. "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
2006-08-29 11:51:20 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lying under oath.
No, wait a minute I'm wrong. He wasn't under oath. Thats how he can get away with it.
I know incompentence is not grounds for impeachment.
Perhaps a search of his office would turn up some weapons of mass destruction.
Maybe the democrats will figure something out after November.
2006-08-29 14:55:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read the Constitution. The grounds have not changed. Treason, Highcrimes and Misdemeanors.
Still the same old piece of paper the Foreign agents working in this administration have not changed it yet.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-29 12:07:38 · answer #4 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hm mm someone ask Jim W how you take a back punching someone in the nose....and Coragryph since you have studied law for 20 yrs you must know that the burden of proof is on the accuser, where is your proof?
2006-08-29 11:55:06 · answer #5 · answered by W E J 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial.
2006-08-29 11:49:09 · answer #6 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush failing to withdraw a pre-emptive strike that is still getting worse after he admitted he implemented it on false intelligence.
2006-08-29 11:47:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Saddam has Weapons of Mass Destruction" -Dubya
What happened to those?
2006-08-29 11:51:07 · answer #8 · answered by chabnormal 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, keep tryin', Libs!
2006-08-29 11:56:35 · answer #9 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋