out of 350 million americans how is it that bush and kerry are the top candidates in which both went to the same university and both were part of the same faternity the skull and bones???????????????
2006-08-29 04:39:16 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah, imagine if we voted for people based on their intelligence and ability to lead. Someone with experience and a good judge of what American real stands for. Someone we could actually be proud of... Imagine. (instead ignorant Americans either don’t vote or vote for who they think is popular, famous or who they saw on TV the most.)
WAKE UP! Let's stop with this coffee house politics and take a stand. Unite and vote… find the right person (he/she is among us) and make America the great place it was always supposed to be.
Seek the truth, question those who would try and manipulate us, GET OUT AND VOTE & get your neighbor to vote, try to see beyond two party politics if that’s what it takes, act locally… get involved or we are doomed for the same BS as always
PS: there is a great new Neil Young song on his new CD that talks about the next great leader walking among us... give it a listen. He also has a lot of good things to say...
http://www.neilyoung.com/lwwtoday/index.html
2006-08-29 04:56:24 · answer #1 · answered by Sir Greggath 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, we only get two or three choices to vote on. So, alot of people who might do a better job are not even considered. In order to run for president, you have to come up with alot of money and convince a bunch of big companies to back you. You have to pay for advertising on TV so people know who you are and some of the things you stand for. Also, the things they tell us while running for the office are not always what they end up doing after elected. So, we are constantly getting ripped off by their false advertising, and promises for better rules and lower taxes that come true. Bush is from a political family and already knew how to get into office without any help from the public. Kerry, I don't know anything about, so I can't say.
2006-08-29 11:51:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush was the incumbent.
And for some bizarre reason, the Democratic party believed that Kerry stood a chance.
Personally, I think if the Democrats had nominated anyone with a pulse, someone who was capable of smiling occasionally, they would have one. It's beyond comprehension that the couldn't find anyone better. But that just shows how far the party has fallen.
2006-08-29 11:43:30 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The party has gotten so out of wack and so far to the left, they wouldn't nominate anyone who would actually have reasonable views. I don't know if Lieberman would have been a good president or not, but he couldn't have been worse than Kerry.
2006-08-29 11:46:01 · answer #4 · answered by sethle99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are rich and both belong to the two big parties. And skull and bones isn't a fraternity, it's a "secret society."
2006-08-29 11:48:36 · answer #5 · answered by dh23232003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Skull and Bones isn't a fraternity, it's a very powerful "secret organization" as is often referred to as being "The Illuminati". Thusly, providing your answer.
2006-08-29 11:43:01 · answer #6 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You make a very excellent point. Wealth and privilege certainly have their benefits. Both men were born and bred to be Washington bigwigs.
2006-08-29 11:46:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money and Big Business run the world.
2006-08-29 11:42:52 · answer #8 · answered by EMAILSKIP 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not to mention they are cousins....far removed but still cousins..hmmmmmmm
Hidden agenda? No that can't possibly be America never has hidden agendas.....YEAH RIGHT...LOOK AT OUR HISTORY and not just what they print in school text books...this is bigger than we all think and it's sad.
2006-08-29 12:05:45 · answer #9 · answered by Miss J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting indeed.
2006-08-29 11:45:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋