darell hair is considered as foe of asian players.if someone like billy bowden or simon taufel would have done it, he would have been easily forgiven by ICC. what are your comments??????????
2006-08-29 03:48:18 · 5 answers · asked by answer me 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
EVERY THING DECIDED AFTER CONSIDERING ONE PERSON'S PAST TRACK RECORD.
IN PAST, HAIR SUPPOSED TO BE AN ANTI-ASIAN.
IF THOSE GENTLEMEN WHO YOU PRESCRIBED DID THE SAME, THEY WILL BE FORGIVEN THIS TIME.
BUT IT CONTINUES FURTHER, THEY TOO WILL BE TEARED OFF.
2006-08-29 18:41:57 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Certainly. Hair's reputation has begun to wear thin.
However, I must add that if Bowden, Taufel, Bucknor, Shepherd or Bird, had acted in exactly the same way as Hair did in this one match, he should have been reprimanded for his actions. We are not speaking of one offence even in this match. Hair's secretiveness, his declining to meet the senior referee before enforcing the first forfeiture in history, these all stack up against him.
As kids we usde to chant a sentence: "The umpire's word is law!" What this means is that no one can question it, and - this is most significant in relation to all laws confering authority on people of unimpeachable reputation - the umpire need not state reasons for his decision.
"Without giving reasons" does not mean "Without reasons" or "giving false reasons". When one is confronted with an umpire not only acting without reasons that an ordinary mortal can comprehend, but when also his conduct on that day is such that it seems conspiratorial, then the whole basis for expecting gentlemanly conduct from the players is undermined. Nobody asked Hair to open Pandora's box. Now he must abide by the consequences.
In considering the Third Test, his post match behaviour in trying to blackmail the ICC must also be considered.
Hypothetical questions are always dangerous. The point is that while Hair committed all the sins outlined above, the other umpires have not. Most people would add that no umpire other than Hair could ever have committed them.
Hair seems to be an evil genius!
2006-08-29 14:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by RebelBlood 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it is not so Umpire Hair is a biased chap towards Asians ! His record proves it !
2006-08-29 12:12:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes Hair is a racist
2006-09-01 14:18:26 · answer #4 · answered by nuwanusa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nnnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooooooo
2006-09-02 04:55:49 · answer #5 · answered by shahid_it1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋