What question exactly deserves an "abuse report"?

Question

I recieved a "warning of suspension" from yahoo because I asked a historical question about the Holocaust. And I see thousands of indecent and disrespectful questions and remarks made about religeons, spiritual leaders, gays and others. Do they all get the same warning I got? or is it OK to argue or debate any subject except the Holocaust?

Answer 1

Someone was obviously offended by your question,its as simple as that.Like you,I see much on here that really deserves to be ousted,but no-one reports it,so it goes on! Perhaps the way you worded it,someone got the wrong idea? Who knows. Its always best to go over your question,rephrasing it if necessary, to suit others minds!! Things sometimes get misinterpreted due to the different nationalities/cultures on here.

Answer 2

I don't know what your question was but you are right. The problem is, a lot of people on here don't know the rules here or don't care about them. People are more likely to report abuse if they are personally offended by the question, regardless of the intent of the question, that to really look and see what the askers is wanting to know. These same people will wave their freedom of speech banner and post all manner if irresponsible pornography and filth. Those questions should not even be allowed to get through to the board. Yahoo does not care enough to moderate the messages and leaves it up to the askers and answerers to moderate- you cannot expect any better than that because there are very few that will moderate out of a sense of morality and holding a standard and caring about what others, especially the younger people will see on this board. Most people will moderate according to their own pridefulness, agenda or rebellion, some wil just report because they decided they don't like you.
My general rule now is that if I am offended by the question I don't even look at it or give it the time of day. The only time I would report someone is if someone were soliciting minors for "relationship" purposes.

Answer 3

You must have asked if it really happened or something like that. Judaism has been a formidable religion for a long time and been persecuted because as a social organization of people who put their noses to the grindstone, they excel like little robots. They are well intentioned about what they do except to the extent they only want other Jews to profit from it. They are an exclusive society as are many other organizations, especially religious organizations around the world. Like the game King of the Hill, those who profit from being social while others are oppressed are often seen as the problem in society and sooner or later pressure builds enough for societies to crumble from under them. Oft times the religious groupings worry about life after death and speculate on eternal punishment and spread this fear to justify their own organizational religious function. This spiritual terror begets physical terror from the oppressed and eventually something has to blow and the King of the Hill is dragged down. But noone likes the idea of millions of people being killed over situations like this and denying it ever happened is a touchy subject. Peolpe really do and really did get hurt, lots of em. So be careful about denying something like this occurred without back up documentation amongst your piers. It really is not acceptable to do that. Conjecture and speculation about validity on your part about something as terrible as the Holocaust is really abusive to others. Sorry

Answer 4

exciting concept. even with the undeniable fact that it received't artwork. although you created this way of record and printed it, that they'd purely submit decrease than diverse names. actual i think countless of them are with out issues sock puppets for an further contained in the first position. a significantly better concept is to carry correcting such incorrect information the position you locate it with links to valid advice and understand-how.... keep flagging the bull as bull and countering it. something else can not artwork in the type of talk board because of the actual undeniable truth that screennames usually at the on the spot are not surely names. i'd also like as a fashion to characteristic -- growing a record is giving them extra information than they deserve, and extra credence than their spewing of inaccurate propaganda warrants. in point of fact that they are idiots and oil organization shills -- a number of them very nearly continuously even paid to do it through promotion organizations -- why make their scummy jobs a lot less difficult?

Answer 5

dude- i had some prick report and successfully remove a message of mine and all it contained was the word "moron". So Im not surprised. I dont think the Yahoo staff looks at the bigger picture when it comes to what they consider 'improper' responses - I think they are just mindless, shallow lapdogs for any whiny, ego-filled, hyper sensitive douche bag that complains. (can you tell i no longer care?)

Answer 6

I think thats bullsh*t. The holocaust was a HUGE mark in history. Who knows why that happened, maybe it offended some lame jerk and they decided to be an a$$ about it. Thats unfortunate for you.

Answer 7

It depends on the content of the question. Other questions do get the same warning as you got.
Last question is NO!!!

Answer 8

Someone let yahoo moderators outta their cages again didnt they?

Answer 9

Read the thing on it then,

I would say nothing it should be free speach...

Answer 10

it must be a touching subject