I saw this coming the second they arrested him. He looks like a crazy who just wanted the attention and limelight - and now his time is done. What an idiot!
2006-08-29 02:33:41 · 15 answers · asked by Rachel 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yeah, I agree. There was so much controversial facts and evidence. I think the guy just wanted attention, but he did look real wacko in all the photos I've seen, and he married like two teenage girls. That's weird... But, yeah, I think the real killer is still out there...
2006-08-29 02:37:55 · answer #1 · answered by AmandaGurl<3 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was not surprised at all, I was eating when it was being aired, and a police officer and I both said that just does not seem right it was too scripted. We both said but don't they have DNA evidence, then they do not need his statement.
What some people will do to be recognized he had his fifteen minutes of fame using the death of a child he should be castrated and the hung. We don't play in the Caribbean. mess with children nah that will not fly. You will be put under the jail no press for you.
2006-08-29 02:46:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I felt the same shortly after his arrest and the questions arose regarding his whereabouts at the time of the murder, and his mental condition. The type of delusional, deviant sickness he has gives him sexual gratification for getting this type of attention and, even though he is innocent of the crime, somewhat puts him close to the gruesome event and helps fulfill his perverted fantasy. I just hope since they foolishly released him from custody, he surrenders his heart to Christ for healing and deliverance from those demons, or, at the very least, seeks psychiatric help. He needs to be away from the general population for now.
2006-08-29 02:46:10 · answer #3 · answered by Regina D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I wasn't either. From what he has done already (various child porn crimes) I think he probably needs to be in prison, though.
And his ex-wife - who had nothing to gain by defending him, and doesn't like him - said right from the start that he wasn't anywhere near the right place to kill the little girl at that time.
Utterly unrelated to crime - what is the deal with John Karr's trousers? They seem awfully high up on him.
2006-08-29 02:38:54 · answer #4 · answered by marzipanthecat 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i grew to become into no longer shocked in any respect - I had "studied" the case some years in the past by using looking at all of the documentaries and television-movies approximately it (no longer that television does not lie, although). there is basically too plenty info that factors to the Ramseys for me to think of that anybody else did it. it truly is totally no longer uncomplicated to think of that a mom might try this to her baby, or maybe my ideal chum refuses to believe what I just about recognize. The MEDIA has blown the finished subject out of proportion - by using "finished subject" I recommend this new John Carr guy who mentioned he did it. The media all of the unexpected says "info shows the crime grew to become into executed by using a white male" while truly, it truly is no longer genuine! basically one Boulder investigator had the intruder concept - all of the others concept a kinfolk member or somebody who knew JonBenet did it. I published an identical question some days in the past, and in it I quoted the factors I checklist under - in case you have an interest in an diagnosis of the ransom observe (for which all indications factor to it being written by using a girl, probable Patsy) or the case, please visit those sites under. exciting examining if no longer the rest!
2016-11-06 00:41:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just hope the law is written in such a way that he can't profit from it. I know that convicts cannot earn money from books or notoriety gained from their crimes but I'm not sure if the law covers people who do not get convicted. I'd hate to see this guy come out with a "my story" book and make millions claiming he was hounded and railroaded.
2006-08-29 02:39:42 · answer #6 · answered by Kuji 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not surprised. It was a complete waste of time and resources to even arrest that guy. He was just a crazy lunatic that is in love with dead little girls.
Hmm...I am thinking that in itself should be enough to put him away. I mean he "says" he has kissed little girls "in the mouth" so lock him up before he actually does something.
2006-08-29 03:38:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep! Personally I think part/all of the truth died with the mother. This will go down as an unsolved murder. Can't really compare the two, but evidence and witnesses are too much like the O.J. trail.
2006-08-29 03:03:54 · answer #8 · answered by MrsPTB4Life 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree ... he's a freak .. must be the medication he was taking to become a woman. I personally would have chosen something else to get attention ... the whole admitting to a murder thing ... kinda sick and twisted. He needs a good B**tch slap !
2006-08-29 02:38:04 · answer #9 · answered by spartexcites 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not surprised. The guilty party is the brother. I've thought that from the beginning. Ever notice how no one ever says much about him?
2006-08-29 02:42:55 · answer #10 · answered by dumpling 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋