English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

for example; we can think of aliens with five heads made of plutonium, but it's all still in our frame of reference. We know what heads are and plutonium!

2006-08-29 01:47:02 · 10 answers · asked by Suide 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

10 answers

Agreed, we can only relate the unknown to the known.

2006-08-29 01:51:21 · answer #1 · answered by Captain Eyewash 5 · 0 1

It's relative, like anything else.

A rationalist, by strict definition of the word, believes that we can know things simply by thinking about them.

An empiricist believes that we can only know things by experience.

Most people are a mix of the two, depending on the subject matter.

Regarding people with heads made of Plutonium, I can know something without experiencing it: I know that a head-butting contest would be a disaster for both parties and their entire planet!

2006-08-29 08:54:51 · answer #2 · answered by almintaka 4 · 0 0

We can't think of something completely unfamiliar with our own point of reference but we can receive 'messages' from the collective unconscious that are completely fresh and new to us.

For example, most people who see UFOs see the traditional saucer shape or orb. I saw a UFO that was shaped like a square with lights on each corner and one in the center of the bottom. I'd say it really was a UFO and not imagination.

2006-08-29 08:58:34 · answer #3 · answered by a_delphic_oracle 6 · 0 0

A writer lives by imagining things he doesn't know. But there are elements of reality which are beyond us now and writing can only hint at them.

2006-08-29 08:50:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

"Nobody can jump over his/her own shadow." This is what a Romanian writer said, once, and I happen to agree with him. I also agree with you, because you said the same thing, but using an example.

2006-08-29 09:35:23 · answer #5 · answered by mrquestion 6 · 0 0

We have known knowns, that is thing which we know we know and he have known unknowns, things which we know we do not know. However, we also have unknown unknowns, things which we do not know we do not know.

I love that speech. These guys are running the world and that's how they speak. Ha ha ha. We're all doomed.

2006-08-29 08:54:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What we think does exist somewhere and what exist some one thinks. What are all these fiction, starwars, aliens. Hence we do think about those which we don't know.

2006-08-29 08:53:37 · answer #7 · answered by Mr Fact 3 · 0 0

Thinking of something that we don’t know is the basis of invention. Thinking of something that we don’t know if the mother of imagination. Before we can discover it, know it, invent it, dream it, we must think of it.

2006-08-29 11:51:10 · answer #8 · answered by Maddog Salamander 5 · 0 0

Disagree. If that were the case, there would be no new inventions, stories, or geniuses. We'd be stagnant.

2006-08-29 08:53:13 · answer #9 · answered by LadyJag 5 · 0 0

maybe.. but we could hallucinate! LOL..

2006-08-29 09:17:32 · answer #10 · answered by genius777 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers