Now who?
2006-08-29 01:08:30 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Strange, scary and sad.
2006-08-29 01:13:21 · answer #1 · answered by Iridium190 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Im beginning to think it was her mom that did it. She didn't seem so concerned about her daughters death...and she acted like weird about it....like she was warm water. That ransome note, well it had nice handwriting, guys don't normally have nice hand writing and u can usually tell if its a guys hand writing. My mom said its more like a womens hand writing. Gives u a clue. Another clue, JonBenets mom got mad at her cuz she wet the bed. What little kid doesn't?!
So her mom must have did it. It also seemed as if her mom was jealous about her daughter being a little model or beauty. So u really wonder.
2006-08-29 01:14:51 · answer #2 · answered by ♥mcmanda♥ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As all human beings has talked approximately, J. M. Karr is harmless of the crime. What he's likewise, is an opportunist. He became into in Thailand for each and all the incorrect reasons, dallying with the rustic's terrible baby intercourse marketplace, as many Europeans, and so on., are apparently susceptible to do. For what ever reason, the tolerance of the Thai police had reached its snapping element and that they have got been approximately to arrest him, probably for crimes against little ones. think of being in a Thai reformatory. i won't be able to stand being in a Thai eating place. So, opportunistically, he "confessed" to the main debatable baby homicide in 0.5 a century, understanding the Thai police does not touch him, yet as a replace would cart him off to the u . s . for trial positioned up haste. did no longer he dine on champagne and lobster en direction? universal of the shrewdness of a individual that preys on different human beings. that is doubly unhappy because it took suspicion far flung from the probably, albeit now deceased, wrongdoer of Jon Benet's merciless loss of life. Manhunts like that which ensued after J.B.'s or the Simpson/Goldman murders "produce outcomes." the certainty that the did no longer is testimony to the certainty that the to blame events have been status exterior the pool of regularly occurring suspects through their visibility, public attractiveness and wealth. This dynamic is enjoying previously our eyes as quickly as lower back, as those 2, no longer extremely friendly Brits thrash on the international point posturing their innocence. inspite of the mechanism, yet for his or her strikes, their tiny daughter would nevertheless be between us.
2016-12-17 19:06:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats a very good question. I whish i had the answers, but also why would JM Karr admitt to it if he is not guilty.
2006-08-29 01:14:33 · answer #4 · answered by michtb3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's sad the person who killed jon benet is still at large, but from the get-go i foundit hard to believe mr,karrs story.
2006-08-29 03:12:37 · answer #5 · answered by kara 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's what they said, but why did they go all the way to Thailand to get the man if they didn't have sufficient evidence?? A free ride back home?? This is truly disturbing. If he didn't do it, then the individual who did really covered up their tracks.
2006-08-29 01:20:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If anyone truly believed he killed her then they are idiots, he very obviously was just a nutcase who wanted a free ride home and that's what he got, champagne, prawns and all.
2006-08-29 01:15:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We may never find out but if I did not do something I would not say I did.
2006-08-29 01:15:59 · answer #8 · answered by Carol W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just feel bad for the family, after they thought they had closure.
2006-08-29 01:14:24 · answer #9 · answered by jay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure there's ever going to be resoultion to this case.
2006-08-29 01:13:34 · answer #10 · answered by Kristen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋