English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Guess how many ?
It is 13 !
What muppet decided on that number ?

2006-08-29 00:37:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 13 13 for God's sake.
12 or 14 = I could live with.

2006-08-29 00:53:47 · update #1

11 answers

Why? 13 is a good number. 12 disciples and the Christ makes 13. It works.

BTW ... Muppet? Too funny.

2006-08-29 01:00:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Whatever the number I would suggest that it will not be enough to cope with the demands of the good people of this country in the future. Nuclear power stations have had a really bad press.

2006-08-29 20:07:22 · answer #2 · answered by kytho 3 · 0 0

I am happy with 13 working power stations. Its better than 12 plus a big green cloud...

2006-08-29 00:39:47 · answer #3 · answered by Well, said Alberto 6 · 1 0

Awww, we only have 4, with a fifth under construction and a sixth on the drawing board.

Nothing wrong with nuclear powerstations. After all, they warm the swimming water pleasantly around them (with the water that is used to cool the rods). :)

2006-08-29 00:43:40 · answer #4 · answered by dane 4 · 0 0

Thats a little silly, although the chances of something going wrong are incredibly low, I believe we should have more, as its much better for the environment, much more efficient and we're running out of fossil fuels fast.

2006-08-29 00:52:54 · answer #5 · answered by fleaciante 2 · 0 0

the united kingdom shouldn't build greater NUCLEAR PWER STATIONS! From the historic previous at the back of Selafield and its disgusting out positioned of poisonous waste to no longer point out it dumping it interior the Irish sea is a disaster for the encompassing international locations for the destiny. the united kingdom and Tony Blair could desire to be gaining knowledge of greater renewable skill of potential, inclusive of wind and water and photograph voltaic potential, how can we obtain a destiny for our childrens while there's a relentless grim reaper waiting interior the shadows, that's what nuclear potential can purely supply interior the long-term to no longer point out the upward push consequence it could have on international warming, the study at the back of Selafields risk-free practices protocols and mishaps over the final 10 yrs proves my element, to no longer point out the quantity of coastal cities alongside the Irish coast that have had a upward push in maximum cancers and leukaemia deaths and births over the final 20 yrs! Nuclear poisonous waste takes billions of yrs to degrade and breakdown and merely how is it meant to be stored, because of the fact putting it in a hollow interior the floor gained’t make it bypass away! If we elect a destiny for our childrens and this planet we could desire to continually be putting greater tax money and study in to the scientific skill of potential inclusive of chilly Fusion, if the technology international develop into funded greater and had greater get admission to to money on a multi million £ foundation the probability is it ought to develop right into a certainty supply or take 20 peculiar yrs. yet no mankind continually opts for the easy way out.bloodie familiar! you may desire to take a glance on the u . s . and their Nuclear potential vegetation out positioned and bear in innovations that they are the reason of the main important pollution interior the international. I additionally strongly merchandise on the skill of risk-free practices. each and every difficulty regarding the reality that the united kingdom is a objective for terrorist businesses and that it is likewise a multi cultural u . s . a ., which homes those terrorists! If a potential plant develop into to be centred it may wipe no longer purely the united kingdom yet France, eire, The Netherlands and different Scandinavian international locations off the face of the planet turning them to substantial barren area’s with no longer something final however the bones of its human beings. merely take a glance at Chernobyl to comprehend that…

2016-12-11 17:08:23 · answer #6 · answered by dricketts 4 · 0 0

well without power you'll wouldn't have your computer to ask questions, nealy all your mods n cons, what would you like oil or coal stations which will run out definitly in 60-100 years, not matter what power stations there are there will always be draw backs, be thankfull we have power stations.

2006-08-29 00:47:31 · answer #7 · answered by omoxionuk 2 · 0 1

they made it that number because it is unlucky although i dont know if you knew this but it might soon be 14 as they are thinking of building another one lol

2006-08-29 00:48:49 · answer #8 · answered by tamzin b useful today 2 · 0 0

. . . more to the point, whatever happened to Atomic Kitten ? . . .

2006-08-29 10:02:52 · answer #9 · answered by Astra 6 · 0 0

it's not a bad idea

2006-08-29 22:11:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers