English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

USA S interfearence with other countries affairs is like our interfearing in a neighbours fight or a broll. this has had long ranging repurcutions on many innocent citizens .

2006-08-28 23:29:30 · 16 answers · asked by venkat 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

16 answers

if you pay closer attention to details, you will see that the USA is not only interfering , it is infringing its own policies, way of life, ideology etc.. on those who are of other descendants and cultures. the USA is and always will and have always been , a nation that breeds on power, usurp that power and it will act like a child throwing a tantrum " e.g the war in Vietnam. the war in Iraq and etc...

2006-08-28 23:36:15 · answer #1 · answered by interested 4 · 2 1

Jefferson wrote the form and he became into an idealist and a psychological. He even supported the French of their revolution which went from a Constitutional Monarchy to a Liberal Democracy after the king became into beheaded and then became a laissez faire Republic until it ultimately ended up as a Totalitarian Regime. As France went by those countless ranges interior the the direction of a decade many strikes would emerge and one such circulation became into the Communards. So staring at history you will discover how liberals have stable attachments with Jefferson's ideals. What has surpassed off now's that cutting-area Conservatives have taken up the banner of Libertarianism and Constitutionalism which earlier to the French Revolution became into the forex of Socialists and Anarchists who opposed Slavery, Ancien regime, racism, sexism and despotism.

2016-12-17 19:06:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

the U,S, has to me double standards, im America they try t o tell us we have freeedom to do what we want , short of infringing on anothers rights,try telling that tothe N,A,A,C,P, or the A,C,L,U, if you don't do it their way they will want you hung or castrated,
yet, we go into other contries and want to impose our system and way of life on them no matter what they want or believe in even tho these countries have lived successfully for thousands of years, and the ones who are not successful should ask for our help before we push our system on them, and then only if they want to live in a system such as ours, what right do we have to impose our beliefs and culture on anyone else? if they want tolive in a mud shack or tepee or??? don't you feel it is their right? Also, every time we go into another country and meddle into their affairs it cost american lives and the tax payer pays thru the nose, yet ,in every case we have a select group or person who always comes out with their pockets full of money??? or we want something they have, such as oil or? which makes certain groups or persons richer, and some people condem the inquisiions ,what do you call this??

2006-08-29 00:19:00 · answer #3 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 0 0

Your right.

America should withdraw it's troops from Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa, Europe and Korea. Why stop there though? We should also pull our aid from Spain, Iraq, Israel, Mexico, Canada, Europe, China and every other country we give it to.

Now, once we have those billions for us again, we can focus on our own problems and really piss off the rest of the world.

People may not like us and want us out of their countries, but they want our Aid and financial donations. It's either we pull out all the way or keep it as it is.

2006-08-28 23:39:39 · answer #4 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 1 0

I agree - the last two times we stay out and let the rest of the world deal with its issues without our involved let to World War I and World War II. If the United States would step back again we would finally have World War III - have a world wide nuclear exchange - and all human problems would be resolved because we would all be dead.

2006-08-28 23:50:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are 3 basic reasons why the U. S. A. does that:

1. Instability anywhere can be dangerous for her (9/11)
2. Only Americans are strong and courageous enough to act so (Yugoslavia)
3. She has her dirty little economic and political reasons (Iraq)

2006-08-28 23:37:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If my neighbors fight is resulting in people being killed or badly injured I would interfere. If my neighbor is threatening another neighbor I would help the one threatened. If we never "Interfered" where would Kuwait be? How many people was Saddam supposed to kill before someone interfered? How many women would have been killed in Afghanistan for wanting to go to school or be a teacher? We haven't interfered in Africa where millions are starving and the victims of genocide. I think we should. UN soldiers in Africa have been raping women and no one interferes. Bet they wish someone would!

2006-08-28 23:41:38 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 1 0

This question doesn't make much sense to me. The U.S has a longstanding history of trying to help other countries out, and to try and better the world as a whole. Also, try spell checking your post.

2006-08-28 23:40:06 · answer #8 · answered by Greg 5 · 1 1

The current administration raelly puzzles em because it is Republican and normally republicans are Larz -free so it means they only care about their own business so its rally puzzling about Bush

2006-08-28 23:52:52 · answer #9 · answered by legolas g/Frederich 4 · 0 0

q-burt, you're an idiot. the US isn't the worlds biggest aid downer, it's Europe. Europe gives 40 billion $ every year to poor countries, unlike your 16 billion $, half of witch goes to Israel. but yeah, I forgot, your media lies to you.

2006-08-29 00:37:35 · answer #10 · answered by tsar 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers