2006-08-28 20:20:39 · 19 answers · asked by _Br!hter_ 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
it's funny, we go into iraq to fight terrorism and the liberals blast bush for it. we don't get involved with isreal's battle with terrorism and the liberals go after bush for that
i guess you just can't make them happy.
2006-08-28 21:03:35 · answer #1 · answered by BUBBA'S OWN 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush has nothing to do with terrorism. For example, Muslim extremists kidnapped and killed Israeli athletes at the Olympics in the 70's, attacked our embassy in Iran also in the 70's. What about Hezbollah blowing up our embassy and barracks in Lebanon in the 80's, they also kidnapped, tortured and killed an American in the 80's amongst other things. The USS Cole and '93 Trade Center bombings. The attacks in London, Madrid, India, Darfur, Phillipines, and so on --- we could go on and on. Muslim terrorists have been a plague in the world for a long time and George Bush was thankfully the 1st to stand up to that stain.
Addition:
WBrian 28 --
First of all, the question posed was if Bush is responsible and all it does is echo left-wing propaganda. My comments were to prove that Bush has nothing to do with terrorism around the world.
Second of all, you are right when you say that there needs to be a consideration of the underlying reason for terrorism and while it can be said there are many reasons from the occupation of Palestine to Middle East policy (all are certainly provocative), the REAL underlying reason is that Muslim extremists believe all infidels must convert or die and that the whole world should be ruled as they see fit (i.e. Taliban) and it permeates throughout the world. It isn't just America or Israel, but Europe, Russia, India, Africa, Turkey, Phillipines and others are all affected.
2006-08-28 20:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by OatesATM 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you're basically getting your self right into a pissing contest. Time to enable go of the gangster mentality. the two events are working as a set to break the rustic. Whom ever comes after BHO, will proceed the ball rolling, basically like Bush persevered Clinton's stride. provide up being a lemming, and attempt to have an unique concept. there is the place the concern is, no person thinks for themselves any further.
2016-11-06 00:17:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OatesATM - You're right, but remember:
The Palestinians were fighting against what they saw as an occupation. Iran was fighting against a US-propped Shah who wasn't exactly a portrait of treating his people well.
The actions of terrorists are nothing but horrible, but ignoring the underlying condition as if these people just randomly wanted to kill athletes or take hostages in an embassy on a random whim is the arrogance that led these idiots to take violent action in the first place.
Nothing justifies the violence - if they want freedom, if they have complaints it's their responsibility to use peaceful methods to create the necessary change. But it's the responsibility of the world to work together to create freedom via non-violent methods. Violence will occur. Good people will work to make it happen as infrequently as possible - not seek revenge everytime a wrong is committed. Revenge and Justice are not the same thing. Seeking revenge is the very mindset we claim to be fighting against, just as they bait us into doing exactly what they want us to do.
2006-08-28 20:36:08 · answer #4 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Proof is in my picture j/k... No I don't because terrorism has been around long before Bush took office. It's just that our government didn't chose to react till 9/11.
2006-08-28 20:26:16 · answer #5 · answered by Madness_75 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I do!
Terrorist hit the US hard!
But they were from else where!
So, I believe President Bush is doing a great job by preventing potential threats!
Yea!
2006-08-28 20:30:45 · answer #6 · answered by Thek Glorias 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes , Pres.Bush is not responsible for all terrorism going in this world. I't is their american gov;t or CIA responsible for all of this because of their COLONIALISM mentality. They used the word DEMOCRACY in order to penetrate to a peaceful country like IRAQ, VIETNAM, CUBA .
2006-08-28 21:12:12 · answer #7 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure he does...
Hes the leader of the free world, in charge of the strongest most advanced military on the face of the planet... there will always be screaming little dictators trying to provoke a fight ...
2006-08-28 20:36:06 · answer #8 · answered by Dear Blabby 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course he has something to do with it. Hes out there trying to stop it. If you see someone out there being beet up on the streets do you just sit back and watch or go and help, even though you weren't asked? No you og over there and beet the crap out of the guy. Thats what George is trying to do.
2006-08-28 20:25:20 · answer #9 · answered by Eugene 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, George W. Bush is a moran.
2006-08-31 16:08:40 · answer #10 · answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋