Can we openly examine the possibility that the current administration was complicit in the 9/11 scheme.?

Question

In mathematics when solving an equation and you have the answer, you change the equation around and solve for x. In this equation :

on 9/11 three planes were jacked; much damage, death and mayhem + x (the unknown...who did it) = who benefited.
solve for x
9/11 - who beneifit = x (who dunnit)

x = the war hawks of the current administration who would not have been able to carry out their international policy otherwise. Haliburton, who makes money on war. Oh, Dick and George are invested in same. How about Osama was,(still?) a cia agent or the Bin Laddens flying out of dodge on 9/11...or how about companies that pulled their money and employees out of the stock market and world trade center. Can we have an honest discussion? Maybe not, 'cause that would be treasonous.

Answer 1

If this is treason then I'd be stuffed into a (nonexistent) holding cell somewhere in this planet by the time I finish writing.

Careful planning seems to be the recurrent theme here. Someone said that this was a cowardly attack. I'd like to call it subtle, in a way most people would miss.

Forget about who benefited, who might have planned it, or whatnot. What I saw was everything had been fleshed out in concert, planned out down to the last detail, like a perfect clockwork. Which is why I had my doubts from the moment I saw the news years ago.

When was the last time you saw a suicide bomber planned his attack? The term suicide bomber gave the lie to the whole thing: it wasn't. And this was often employed by - forgive me, but I have to say this and it is a fact - in Middle east, especially in Iraq, as we always see every day now. That kind is no planned attack. The only planned part of it was the bomb, no more.

What I'm trying to say here is that planning, especially in a major crime, is not within the fore of the Middle Eastern minds. With limited supplies and information, there was no way one could orchestrate such a massive tragedy - 3 planes hijacked simultaneously!! - to its terrible fruition of that day. This is more in the lines of a cool, resourceful mind, or minds.

That's my two cents, and I think someone is coming up to me. I wonder what is that under his coat.

Answer 2

What is treasonous is the fact that this administration is not being honest about one damn thing whether it's about 9/11 or anything you mentioned above in your question.
If Bush had taken a few minutes to read what was placed in front of him the day he was going on vacation innocents would not have lost their lives but because Bush had no time for his "job" that day we all know all to well the results of 9/11.
The current administration turned a blind eye to what was about to happen and for profit reasons also.
This is more fact then fiction and if we are ever allowed to check these things out for ourselves everyone would know the truth behind it all.
Bush also knew where Bin Ladden was and what he was up to and what he followed through with those plans too.
Bush is not at all the patriot he wants Americans to believe he is but he is a coward and his past record proves it all to well too.
The club the and his old man belonged to and still do since collage says an awful lot about who they really are.
And remember the brance didn't fall far from the tree or should I say from the fallen Bush?

Answer 3

I doubt people from the highest sectors of the government will allow some sort of "investigation" to happen. I definitely don't think we know the full story, but what needs to happen first is a greater mobilization among eveyday people especially on the week of this upcoming 9/11. The media on our tv stations are owned by a few mega corporations that are complicit in following whatever the government wants them to talk about...like a white girl who gets kidnapped in Bermuda, young beauty pageant contestant killed 5 years ago.

Some of us already are convinced of the answer, that it was an inside job. A lot of us are. I think its a matter of telling friends to watch the dozens of 9/11 videos out there on google or youtube, or to visit the many sites out there asking the hard questions. Many people are shocked and angered after understanding the skepticism of the real story, and we should continue teaching others until it cant be ignored anymore.

Answer 4

It's almost certain that there must be at least some probability that the events of 9/11 are not what they seemed at the time. Even if it's a million to one, there has to be some probability involved here that 9/11 was not what it appeared to be. However, the probability that the current administration was behind this is likely very very low.

Let's deal with some things we can be certain of. Those airplanes could only have arrived at their destination to crash in a limited number of ways.

1. Far fetched possibility is hypnoses or some sort of brain control of the pilots. This would seem to be near impossible with all of the technology that I am aware of. Since it might be possible in theory I will include it anyway.

2. A passenger or passengers took control of the airplane. This of course seems to be the most likely cause. Of course the possibility might exist where these people were under some sort of brain control, but this possibility is so slim I will ignore it. So we will assume that the people who took over the airplane were will to die to kill and destroy so much. They hated us more than they loved their life. Where could all of these people come from which could organize such a complicated task. Also, what sorts of people would be willing to die to accomplish this task. We know that a group of people must have been involved, this limits the possibilities. We know that people were willing to die, this limits possibilities. We know that it was well planned, this limits possbilities. We are limited to a group of people who are capable of organizing a complicated event and executing well to meet their goal at the expense of their life. This limits the group of people enough that, the people we are accusing of this crime are most likely the culprits. A deal could of course been made with this group by some other group. It just seems unlikely that this could have occured through an outside inluence upon the group which commited this crime. The group that commited this crime most likely did it for their own reasons, not becuase someone inlfuenced them to do it by offering some deal.

3. Electronic devices were installed in these airplanes which were able of taking control of the flight. This opens up the possibilities of who could have commited the crime, but the chances that this event occured in this way are probably very low. You would have to be capable of producing such technology. Which would require much expertise, with the airplanes and the electronics that would be required to take control of and fly the airplane without being on the airplane. This might limit the possibilites mostly to governments or huge corporations.

We have considered some ways that this might have happened, but why would it happen. What reasons would someone have to pull off such a caper? If the U.S. government was behind this, there was probably quite a few government people involved in it happening, could so many government officials be willing to commit one of the worst tragedies in American history? I doubt it very much. One leak along the chain of people involved would have uncovered it all. It's most likely that 9/11 occured much the way it is said to have occured. I would place the odds of the current administration being behind this event at 340,000 to 1. That's just on a bet I'd be willing to make, the real odds are probably much much worse if not nearly non existent.

Answer 5

I think we can openly examine the possibility that: Your question = You stupid. Would this current administration also be responsible for Muslim extremists kidnapping and killing Israeli athletes at the Olympics in the 70's, or how about attacking our embassy in Iran while that traitor Jimmy Carter was president, also in the 70's. What about Hezbollah blowing up our embassy and barracks in Lebanon in the 80's, maybe you meant when they kidnapped, tortured and killed an American, also in the 80's. Obviously this administration is to blame for the USS Cole and '93 Trade Center bombings (under Clinton's watch I might add). Or are you also blaming this administration for the attacks in London, Madrid, India, Darfur, Philipines, and so on --- we could go on and on. You are clearly ignorant, we can actually THANK this administration for being the first to have the guts to stand up to these Islamic terrorists.

Answer 6

PLEASE, check the facts without listening to a Michael Moore wanna' be. Osama said he did it. They danced in the streets in the Middle East. They are proud of the fact. What does it take. Bush would have invaded Iraq either way. They were in violation of 16 different UN resolutions that called for the UN to take military action. Bush did not need 911 to invade Iraq.The UN shouldn't make resolutions if they don't have the backbone to carry thru. If they had we wouldn't be there. If they weren't stealing the oil for money food and shipping Saddam money under the table we wouldn't have had to go. Blame the right people for the right things.
911= Afghanistan
UN corruption=Saddam killing hundreds of thousands of people, and telling everyone he had WMD's= Buttkicked

Answer 7

NO, re-examining the event is not necessary, the Muslims claimed responsibility for the cowardly attack on 9/11/01.

What more do you need?

The cowardly attack by Islamo-fascist Muslims achieved nothing for the USA, nor did it result in anything positive for the terrorists. They had their moment of fame.... all to no avail.

Answer 8

Discussions are good. Open-minded people achieve the most knowledge.

I don't understand why some people won't even listen to that possibility. Anything's possible, ladies and gents.

Was this presented on Fahrenheit 911? I haven't seen that documentary yet.

Answer 9

Bush, Cheney & Co. committed a volume of conflict crimes global and mainly in Iraq and Afghanistan. they're certainly conflict criminals and no particular than Nazis that were prosecuted contained in the approach Nurnberg Trial.

Answer 10

Brother, I think you're on to something.... But you know they monitor EVERYTHING..... Get all who will hear you, educated on this and more... ever wonder why the army was sent to save a nation (Kuwait) while a year and a half later they were told to stand still and watch a nation "cleanse one another (Rwanda) ?

"Every official that comes in, cripples us, leaves us maimed, silent and tame, and with our flesh and bones, he builds his homes!!!" RATM