they said that he won't be charged for the murder of JonBenet. do u think they are right? that he isnt the killer? well i think he is the killer. even if they dont charge him for the murder of JonBenet, they should still put him in jail for all the other bad things he did. i know i might sound like im rushing to judge, but he still should be put in jail.
Please tell me wat u think of all of this:)
Thank You:)
2006-08-28 17:24:52 · 21 answers · asked by cheeks 4 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Apparently, according to the investigators, he is not guilty of her murder, as the evidence does not match. He apparently has a lot of knowledge of details of the murder, so it does sound as if he may know who the actual killer is. He is definitely a sick, mentally unbalanced person. He is going to be tried for other crimes. I wish he had been guilty, so that Ramsey family could have some answers, and possibly a bit of peace in their lives.
2006-08-28 17:35:43 · answer #1 · answered by Sue F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the DNA makes him innocent of the murder of JonBenet but when he said "he was there when she died" he could have possibly meant it in a spiritual way. And the attorneys could'nt even place him in colorado when the murder happened. So i do not believe that John Mark Karr committed the murder, but he was someone who wanted to confess to it for the infamacy and recognition.
2006-08-29 07:16:58 · answer #2 · answered by rebekah u 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I pretty much felt from the beginning that he wasn't the killer, but I strongly believe that he has committed his share of perversions.
I think he's just a very sick man who became obsessed with Jon Benet because she was all over the media for so long and he has just convinced himself that he was there with Jon Benet or feels connected with her.
And this business about being in Thailand...
when they first said that that is where they picked him up, well, lets just say we've ALL seen enough Dateline and Primetime Live Undercover shows to get a pretty clear picture of why he was there.
2006-08-29 00:40:20 · answer #3 · answered by mamabunny 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way is he the killer. I responded earlier when someone asked about his arrest -- he is a sick pervert, but I maintain that only someone IN that house COULD have killed her - look at the wealth, the security systems, the way the parents acted refusing to cooperate with police, hiring an attorney before she even had an autopsy! Actions speak louder than words any day of the week.
2006-08-29 00:42:54 · answer #4 · answered by D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its very unlikely that he killed her. His family has alibied him in another state for the night in question, and there was no dna match, as well as inconsistencies in his story. Its good that they got him though, because he evaded justice for kiddie porn in california and now they can dealwith him for that. The killing of Jon Benet will probably be a mystery forever. This was no random act of violence. Someone with power and authority did this and it probably goes deeper than we want to know. In my mind, Jonh Ramsey is not off the hook. The guy was allowed to go unattended into the home and emerged minutes later with her limp body in his arms. How could he find her if they cops didnt? That is just too mysterious. I think that her father had something to do with it even if he wasnt the killer.
2006-08-29 00:34:15 · answer #5 · answered by prancingmonkey 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That guy is a creep...I can see it in his eyes...if he's not guilty of the JonBenet murder, then he's definately guilty of something else, that's for sure.
2006-08-29 00:27:52 · answer #6 · answered by nellie_3000 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yesterday they said that DNA test shows he was not at the murder scene . At this time they don't know the role he played ,He was set free
2006-08-29 10:34:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is not the killer, he was just defending sumone who is the killer but now since they spent so much time beliveing he is the killer the real killer and gone somewhere far far away.
Think about it y would sum1 just come out so openly and say "Yes i killed her".
2006-08-29 00:28:28 · answer #8 · answered by jayR12 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's not the killer. He's just a sicko with a high need for attention.
2006-08-29 00:31:40 · answer #9 · answered by Catspaw 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is a sick sick man, and should be punished for his crimes. The Boulder ploice say that his dna doesn't match the dna found on the little girls panties. That could have been planted there though, so I think they need to investigate more.
2006-08-29 00:28:15 · answer #10 · answered by shell7024 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋