ok, so I know that when the Exposition Universelle opened and the Eiffel Tower was built, the french hated it and wanted to take it down. So i was just wondering: what if they would have taken it down right after it was built (obviously, Paris wouldn't the same), but then someone wanted to build it back up in like 2008 or something. what if THAT would have happened? Do you think rebuilding the Eiffel Tower after 200 years (around there) would change History??
2006-08-28 16:50:45 · 5 answers · asked by emma 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
and they would rebuild it exactly like they had for the Exposition
2006-08-28 16:57:13 · update #1
i think there would be another land mark that would be in place of the eifle tower. i think that if the eifle tower was built in 2008 instead of 200 years ago it would not have the same affect on people as it has today. it hold history to it. we are too advanced now for something like the eifle tower to have such an effect on people as it did before.
2006-08-28 16:55:09 · answer #1 · answered by ness 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's just a large piece of art not a political move. I doubt the French would have done much to add to history either way. The waiters would still be rude and everyone would still pretend to not speak English.
2006-08-28 16:55:39 · answer #2 · answered by Krystle B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A symbol of Paris would certainly have gone and I don;t know what might be in its place
2006-08-28 16:53:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oui, oui mademoiselle
2006-08-28 16:54:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it would change the history!!!!!!!!! I don't care ,because I'm not going!!!!!!!
2006-08-28 16:53:42 · answer #5 · answered by mywaypink 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋