first thing first, why buy a old *** bmw that is prone to breaking. Even a simple part take a lot of money to repair. On that subject you should go buy a honda or something which is more reliable and in the long run can save you a lot of money. Let say that you buy your bmw you would need a few thousand in the banks because the part in the bmw might need to be replace and could be really expensive. My brother bought a lexus and a simple part on there cause like 4,000 grand to fix. So if you want to buy a brand name call buy it new. So if you buy an old one or have the budget to buy like a honda you should.
2006-08-28 15:57:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jason 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The 316 of those years had a four cylinder 1895cc motor. Four speed auto. (I presume you are writing from the states). A bit underpowered and will take forever to get up to speed. Runs well once you are on the open road, and very economical on the open road. A brilliant vehicle for someone who's never in a hurry. Good overall fuel economy
The 320i had 2171cc motor. 5 speed auto box. The stick-shift model had the tendency to stall easy on the pull-away when the revs were too low. Can get very thirsty if you keep the hammer down.
I loved the torqueness of the 4 cylinder. I hated the 320 in a stick shift due to the need for revs and tendency to stall easy, but it was a much smoother vehicle to drive once rolling.
Both cars are so similar with regards to their overall fuel economy, that fuel economy alone should not be the deciding factor as to which of the two vehicle you want to own. Its really up to you to decide which one you like the most after you`ve driven them, as they differ vastly in character.
2006-08-28 21:46:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by lew_lewisje 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey mate, I assume you are in the UK or Europe since those designated models weren't sold here in the U.S. during those times.
I would have to say that the gas difference is not much between the 316 and the 320. Try the diesels to see as well. BMW does not put too much emphasis on gas savings as they focus more on performance.
So, you are pretty much stuck with with each model gives you. A 316/320 4-pot can expect around 22-26 real-life miles a gallon (U.S.) for regular city driving.
2006-08-28 16:16:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by MotorCityMadman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either car is good on gasoline. I would go for 121 cubic inches of displacement, instead of 96 cubic inches. Gas prices going down? not for long, but a little more power pulling into traffic. Hot climate? run the A/C? Get the 320i
2006-08-28 15:57:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by John Paul 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm selling a 1996 Z3 1.9 that has about 240 horsepower - supercharged, cams, aluminum pistons, total suspension, 19" wheels, + + > see my 360 for photos.
2016-03-26 23:36:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jennifer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 320i is a good used car,,and will get good mileage,,i own a repair shop,,and have serviced a few of them before,,i like the way they drive and handle,,a few of my customers have them,,and they seem to be getting good service from them so far,,i hope this help,s.
2006-08-28 15:57:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by dodge man 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
your best bet is to go to
consumerguide.com
look up the specs and everything you look for in a car.They give the complete rundown on a car. Even people that have that car send in feedback.
2006-08-28 15:53:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shady 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try buying 320i.
2006-08-28 16:51:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by THE UNKNOWN 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
316?? thats a new one to me. Never buy a 4cyl BM thier crap go with 6
2006-08-29 05:31:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by drkadrk 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
GET AN M3
2006-08-28 19:25:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by anon 2
·
0⤊
0⤋