English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-28 14:59:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

16 answers

No matter what some of the other answers say about Bush and Bin Laden, it is Bush who has brought all this on by himself and not any other president before him. Bush is in his own very little world and has been since he was in the service which everyone knows as a joke.
Bush is out for blood and he doesn't give a toot who gets killed just as long as his war on terrorism continues, that's his own terrorism that I'm referring to as his plays all his little games with the lives of so many innocents in so many countries including the U.S.A.
This is one idiot who should have never gotten into office and who should not still be in office either.
How much of the tax dollars is it costing us all for him to pay for not being impeached anyway?
I for one want my money back and want it now as I'm not in favor of war or Bush not now not ever.
The world knew Laden for the animal that he is and now the world knows Bush for all his acts of stupidity and selfishness and lies and terrorism and just plain murder but who has to suffer, us the American people as well as the world too.
Yes Bush as made enemies for America and it seems that he has moved ahead of Laden in terms of hatred of countries towards the U.S.A. Laden must be sitting back and relaxing watching the U.S. go down the toilet thanks to Bush. Yeah, Bush has made more enemies for America then for Bin Laden.
Thanks Bush for a whole hell of a lot of nothing.

2006-08-28 15:21:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Bin Laden has more respect than Bush in the world.

2006-08-28 15:39:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Let's see, TrashBin the terrorist or the US President.

You didn't ask about how many dislike each, you wrote enemies; considerably stronger. Though a large portion of the world population may dislike Bush and the current administration I would guess that an even greater number have no strong opinion about him. How many actual enemies? A handful of left-wing wackos, a larger number of Islamofascists, perhaps those who he has released gas upon?

I would have to say TrashBin.

2006-08-28 15:13:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No one other than the US really hates Bin Laden and American will always have enemies.

2006-08-28 15:04:43 · answer #4 · answered by shadowtemplar 2 · 1 0

Terrorism is extensively considered as a damaging form of interest searching for or coverage chaning. Nr, Bush has no longer achieved anyhting to strengthen bin weighted down, in fact he's in fact a forgetton parent.. Israel has achieved plenty however to hold to easy hezbollah, a as quickly as hitherto unkon participant on the internatinon point. it form of feels their chief is greater a threat now than all of us else, humorous shift isnty it?

2016-12-11 16:59:12 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think Bush has made more enemies for The US. I hate his guts. I curse his mother's womb. Bin Laden is probably revered throughout much of the Arab/Muslim world. Now, the brave soldiers of Hezbollah have gained support too. I hope Bush stops breathing. I also hate Rumsfeld and Dick.

2006-08-28 15:09:35 · answer #6 · answered by solipsistic 1 · 2 3

Considering Bush is trying to stop Bin Ladens forces... I think you know.

2006-08-28 15:04:39 · answer #7 · answered by A* 4 · 0 3

If fighting terrorism makes enemies then so be it. People came to this country to get away from the old world in the first place.

2006-08-28 15:57:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Bush inherited this dangerous situation from Clinton. Has everyone already forgot about the 1st terror attack on the World Trade Center under Clinton? How about the attack on the Cole? How about other attacks on U.S. interests during Clinton?

BUT FOR Clinton's inactions, we wouldn't be in this dangerous situation we are in. The 2nd attack on the World Trade Center was years in the making.

While I don't agree with everything President Bush has done, at least he had the courage and resolve to tackle Islamofascism head on. It would have been a lot easier to deal with Islamofascism during Clinton's year, but he was too busy getting oral in the Oval, and kissing up to the Europeans who envy us and our way of living. The world emulates and envies the U.S., and will continue to do so for centuries to come.

Iran, as the chief sponsor of Islamofascism, must be dealt with next before Islamofascism is out of control. We may not like it, but we may well have to use the same tactics we did to deal with Japan in WWII. At least we have a leader in the U.S. that has taken risks, though unpopular by a segment of the country, to deal with Islamofascism. It must be dealt with or it would have exploded much more down the road.

As for enemies, we must fight Islamofascism to protect our citizens and our way of life. I don't give a damn about making nice-nice with terrorists. We will always have enemies, as other countries have, but we have to deal with the biggest threat, and that threat is Islamofascism, led by Iran.

2006-08-28 15:05:54 · answer #9 · answered by EDDie 5 · 2 3

"The Rock" is a soft pusy who would never defend his country, he nay-says and points at liberals for being the demise of America, but think back to after 9/11, when the world was behind us, we could have done anything.. and we did, we went into Afghanistan, which was smart, but Iraq? give me a ****! Dubya is the worst this that could have ever happened to this country, and as for having christians in office? Why should it matter?

CHURCH---------------------Big Distance------------------------- State


Hope I gave some insight!

2006-08-28 15:39:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers