English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

First of all, the things that you ask about are mutually exclusive. If something were truly unmovable it would mean that an unstoppable object did not exist. Conversly, if there were such a thing as an unstoppable object then there could be no such thing as an unmovable object. However, if it were possible for both to coexist and they came together they would annihilate or neutralize each other. Some contend that there would be a huge release of all energy contained within the two objects similar to a nuclear explosion.

2006-08-28 14:25:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The unstoppable object would bounce off or reflected off the unmoveable object at an angle opposite of the unstoppable object when it hits the umoveable object. Vow! Did I really answered that?

2006-08-28 16:09:00 · answer #2 · answered by FILO 6 · 0 0

I guess both will be tolerate. If unstopable moving in 2 m/s hit the unmovable of 0m/s. Lineary the speed of 2 things will be 1m/s, Well, that is also depending on the mass of the unstoppable and unmmovable afterall.

2006-08-28 14:43:20 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Logic 3 · 0 0

Simple: the unstoppable thing plows a hole through the unmovable thing.

2006-08-28 14:25:11 · answer #4 · answered by Angela 3 · 0 0

Is it even possible for something to be unstoppable or something to be unmovable?

2006-08-28 14:18:57 · answer #5 · answered by googoo2626 3 · 0 0

It's logically impossible for both an irresistible force and an immovable object to exist at the same time.

2006-08-28 14:21:02 · answer #6 · answered by sandesmus 2 · 0 0

You have the United States Congress.

2006-08-28 14:20:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The existence of one disallows the existence of the other.


Doug

2006-08-28 14:21:34 · answer #8 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0 0

the thing with the leser mass gets damaged...i.e.........if the thing imovable is of heavier mass the unstopable thing crashes onto that imovable thing and gets damaged or vice-versa...but if they r of equal mass the force gets compensated and none suffers damage!

2006-08-28 14:20:51 · answer #9 · answered by Shruthi 2 · 0 0

It means its the end of the world. LOL

2006-08-28 17:42:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers