from 1 to 10, how do you rate the president of the US?

Question

I rate him a 0 - yes a big fat ZERO. Us middle class people will never have a chance with him in office. Now, Clinton on the other hand got so much negative publicity.........but why??? cuz he got a bl0w job under the table?? Hey, at least he didn't try to ruin the USA and let innocent boys die for no reason!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, and another thing - our gas prices weren't over the roof!!!

VOTE DEMOCRATIC IF YOU WANT TO SURVIVE AS A MIDDLE CLASS CITIZEN IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ha ha ha ha Republicans.............you LOOOOOSE! I got 5 thumbs up and you only got 2............boo hoo

Answer 1

-10

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

As far as the economy goes, he hasn't measured up to Clinton. Our relations with other nations have been better. He has made some poor decisions, he's not particularly strong in public speaking, and he's a businessman. On the other hand he's had some tough breaks. How could Katrina or Cheney's shooting have possibly have been predicted? They were just misfortunes that lowered his public opinion even further. His good qualities are that he has built up our military, he stands strong behind his decisions no matter what, and he's resolute. Other countries know that with him in power, any misconduct is certain to be punished. Everybody seems to forget that after 9/11 we all turned to him for answers and retribution for those who were responsible, and he gave us both. He just got a little carried away with Iraq that's all. haha. He did what he thought was in our best interest. So he made a mistake. Aside from Iraq and Katrina he wasn't all that bad. Overall I'd give him a 5.

I don't think it was right for the public to scrutinize Clinton's private life as much as they did. As far as I know, his affair didn't inhibit his duties as president. however, the president is supposed to be an example. He may have been a good president, but as a role model, he failed. Adultery is just plain dispicable. Although, he has done a fair job at trying to redeem himself through his book and helping with tsunami relief in Indonesia. It's time for a change though, unless the candidates are total dunces, I will be voting democratic in the next election.

Answer 4

Bush : 0
Kerry : 0

Both are lifetime Skull and Bone society members, the US lodge of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Skull and Bone society was created in reaction of the Declaration of Independamce, it was to destroy US spvereignty, and Constitution, we defimitively can't trust neither Bush or Kerry. or even Hillary Clinton, or Cheney...

The Illuminati are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World order, ruled by the martial law.
They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
Bush and Kerry | Skull and Bone : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull
Loose Change 2 Nd Edition : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&q=
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_consciousness (Class consciousness)
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name...and his number is Six hundred & sixty-six. (Rev. 13:15-18)

Answer 5

Seven. I would give Clinton about a five; he had no real consistant policy on any issue (Abortion, Welfare, et cetera).

To those who criticise President Bush:
- He has not privatised welfare. The "Christo-fascist" "Dominonists" that liberals hate so much have spentmillions fighting poverty.

-He has not abolished social security. He wanted to offer seniors the CHOICE of investing their earnings on safe, reliable blue chip stocks. Of course, the former Rockeffeler Republicans who now control the Democratic Party own millions in stocks. (Michael Moore even invested in Halliburton).

- He has increased Education spending by over a third. More than Clinton, but nobody cares about this fact- do they?

- He invaded Iraq because he recieved the same intelligence that Clinton recieved. That's why Clinton signed the 'Iraqi Liberation Act' and started 'Operation Desert Fox'. Read John Kerry's speechs before the Senate in 2003 and compare them to Ned Lamont's current speechs.

- Yes, I am well aware that there were no WMD in Iraq. I also know that Saddam had no connections to bin Laden. There are more terrorist organizations than Al Queda. Read the 9/11 report: Terrorism against the United States is caused by the scapegoating of Arabic dicators. Look back to 1930's Germany, where college students who couldn't find a job blamed Jews, and then replace "Germany" with "Middle East". Saddam gave strategic support to ultranationalists in Palestine and elsewhere.

- Yes, Bush and Cheney overrode Tenet's concerns going in. Put yourself in the president's shoes.
US intelligence failed to anticipate:
The break-up of the Soviet Union
Iraq's invasion of Kuwait
The break-up of Yugoslavia
Islamic extremists' involvement in Somalia
The Sept. 11 attacks (Bush was warned that bin Laden wanted to attack in America, but the details stayed secret)
And so on.

- Why did Bush's supporters want to invade Iraq? For the same reasons the wanted Clinton to intervene in Somalia, Bosnia, and Kosovo. For the same reason they want to do SOMETHING about Darfur. Wilsonian idealism may be wrong, it may be stupid, it may end badly, but is it... really... fascism?

Just for Fun: G.H. Bush = 8, Reagan = 4, Carter = 3, Ford = 8...

Answer 6

8 to 9

Answer 7

Most American citizens are content whomever is in the Oval office, do their 40 hours at work, take their check and enjoy the weekend. Some Americans are unhappy with the condition of the country. And a select few will do ANYTHING to see that President Bush is removed from office.

I think alot of the reason's he is hated so much is the way he has chosen to run things regarding the war in Iraq. Alot of people believe that they should just pack it up and bring our troops home, partly beacuse it has been such a long time since 9/11.

You take a dollar and bury it, you dig it up ten years later. It's still a dollar right? YES. You take a man that organized a attack on the United States, blowing up the twin towers, killing thousands of people. People that NEVER got to tell there family's bye. They just thought they were going to work. a few years pass, and what it doesn't matter anymore? Of course it matters, and President Bush knows that. That's why the war won't end until Osama is caught or killed.

People that say Bill Clinton did a wonderful job when he was in office are full of ****. First off, there was no war & he didn't have as big a problem as there is now with illegal immigrants. The president before Clinton is the one that set everything up so nice so Clinton would have time to Cheat on his wife and stick cigar's up her uknowwhere.

Answer 8

As an standard score i might fee Obama a 4. this question would be met with a chain of hateful comments approximately Obama (and a few fool will say something approximately Bush), yet definitely the president basically has plenty say so. they do no longer look to be an emperor or dictator, so as that they can't basically say issues and make it take place. interior the U. S. presidents are growing to be to be a scapegoat for our frustration, it is comprehensible. That being mentioned human beings might desire to understand the adaptation between dislike of coverage and hate of a individual. I thoroughly disagree with Obama's liberal stance, inspite of the undeniable fact that, it truly is no longer remotely honest to hold him as a individual into question. it truly is my feeling that he's barely (or a minimum of this contributed heavily) president because of the colour of his epidermis. at the same time as human beings say it truly is a racist fact, i might argue that to vote somebody as president because of the fact their race is racist in its self. standard Obama has no longer executed very plenty solid, inspite of the undeniable fact that, he has struggled by using some no longer uncomplicated circumstances and saved the rustic solid.

Answer 9

i find it funny that so many people are complaining about the current president. i am not saying that everything that he is doing is representative of the general wants of the average american citizen but it seems like the whole country is complaining about bush. the question i pose to those of you who wont shut up about how bad of a president he is is this: if so many people hate him then how did he get elected in the first place? and if people didnt realize how 'bad' he was going to be until after his first term then my second question is how did he get reelected? people sure do complain a lot when it was their fault that he got elected and reelected. maybe now people will see the importance of voting and standing up for your beliefs by using the democratic process. in other words...a majority of the people in this country who took the time to actually vote (most of the people who complain about bush most likely DIDN'T vote or he wouldnt be in office now) thought that bush would be a good president and for those that dont agree with that well maybe you should be going after the people who didnt vote instead of the president because he may not be the best president ever but its the non-voters fault that he's in office for a second term.

Answer 10

3 to 4

Answer 11

He's less than a zero.

Let's see if he will suck in the dopes that believe he's got nothing to do with gas prices. If he's got nothing to do with rising prices, the dopes will believe he's responsible for the low prices we will get just before the elections. You know prices will go down at election time.