Lots of people on here got completely indignant when Karr "confessed". Screaming about "I always knew" and people apologizing to the Ramsey's. But it has now been proven that the DNA does NOT match. So now what do those people have to say?
Personally i now believe the Ramseys didn't have anything to do with it. Obviously this Karr guy is a joke. A sick joke who still needs to be locked up ... but still just a joke.
But i want to know what the people who were putting up such hateful messages... just how do you feel now?
2006-08-28 10:57:39 · 8 answers · asked by purple dove 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The reason i think Karr should be locked up is because he is a pedophile. Whether he really had anything to do with this case or not ... he HAS commited this crime on other kids. That's why he should be locked up ... PLUS i am pretty sure it is illegal to hamper an investigation and that's pretty much what he has done.
2006-08-28 11:13:53 · update #1
I never believed the Ramsey's did it. It was a shame they were hounded the way they were. Karr should be prosecuted for false confession have to pay back the money to get him back her and then see if Thailand wants him back to prosecute.
2006-08-28 11:02:11 · answer #1 · answered by Sassy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I really didn't think that Karr committed that crime. If he did he probably wouldn't confess to news reporters who are going to broadcast it all over the world. The guy did this as a publicity stunt and everyone jumped the gun and said he was guilty just like they did in Michael Jackson's case. Anyway if he committed no crime, why should he be locked up. He might be sued for causing intense emotional distress, but not locked up. Those people who jumped the gun are just feeding the media-fire. Anytime there is any hint of a story, all these little douchebag reporters get up there and harrass everyone for some damn exposure. This is just another example that EVERYONE is innocent until proven guilty.
2006-08-28 18:11:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your answer is a good one. Even Mr Ramsey in the beginning stated that it was way too early to just out-right accuse him, and to let the law take its course. Obviously, Karr is unnaturally obsessed with that young, dead child. What to do now? Let the law take its course, of course.
2006-08-28 18:07:06 · answer #3 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As far as JonBenet is concerned back to square one. Unless there is some law against fasle confessions this whack job Karr goes free and probably back to teaching.
What's up with that avatar?
2006-08-28 18:05:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I always thought it was the parents...still do. Even when they arrested Karr, I never swayed from my original guess. I figured the parents paid him off to confess. One way or another, the parents will be brought to justice as their daughters murderers. The mom maybe didn't do it, but she knew...and said nothing! I have faith they will be caught one day.
2006-08-28 18:03:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How exacly does someone do this "Suspicions rapidly fell on her wealthy parents, who resisted police attempts to interview them for months after the killing."?
Interview is a nice word, being questioned is harder!
I was of the understanding that police had the right to question aka 'interview' anyone that may have been possibly involved in or may possibly have had information about a criminal act.
It is frequent that family are involved in murders, what is it that gives this family the right to resist 'interview'?
Sorry to say, but it leads one to think they (now only he) is as guilty as hell somehow. The " I am a greiving parent" crap just doesn't rub in this case. Both were (IMHO) a bit twisted for doing what they did to their daughter while she was alive.
2006-08-28 18:59:04 · answer #6 · answered by zegrze 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
JOHN KARR DiD iT AND i D0NT CARE WHAT ANYONE SAYS!!!!!!! JONBENET WAS A VERY TALENTED LITTLE GIRL!!!! WHO WOULD DO SUCH A THINGGG!
2006-08-28 18:04:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
HAVE HIS FAMILY PAY FOR HIS TRIP BACK TO THAILAND AND HAVE THE LAW THERE TAKE ITS COURSE HE'S SUCH A LOSER
2006-08-28 18:20:13 · answer #8 · answered by sweet 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋