When Democrats win the White House, will conservatives still support warrantless eavesdropping on Americans?

Question

Or will they suddenly become staunch supporters of checks on an overreaching government?

The Soviets and the Nazis both justified their lack of civil protections through the, "If you aren't doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear" line of reasoning. That's fine company for Bush to keep.

Answer 1

The Republicans will be too scared to speak up.

Answer 2

Oh!!!!! you're an oracle? How do you recognize the effect of the 2008 elections? What are the triumphing skill ball numbers? Gimme! First, this question is in accordance with an unprovable assumption so is unanswerable till after the elections. Are you asking will they if...? in case you return in the process the previous elections, while has the effect of a presedential election been challenged? properly, there have been mutterings in 2004 and an entire blown courtroom case in 2000. The Democrats had to retroactively substitute the balloting legislations in Florida to get Gore in. even if if the balloting device grew to become into genuine or incorrect is immaterial at that factor. If it grew to become into incorrect it would have been challenged till now the election. little question, it could have been suitable to the Democrats if that they had gained. or maybe then, after such a number of recounts Bush nonetheless gained yet Gore had to maintain on recounting till he gained and then end. This grew to become right into somewhat better than crying foul, it grew to become right into a show of pathetic whining. the finest contested presidential election grew to become into 1960. Then, it got here right down to Illinois to settle on even if if Kennedy or Nixon gained. Nixon grew to become into properly forward. Then, Chicago mayor Daley basically got here approximately to locate a barn finished of votes which all basically got here approximately to be for Kennedy giving him the state and the Whitehouse. Nixon, while instructed he might desire to contest the effect, refused (definite we are conversing approximately problematic Dicky) because of the fact taking the effect of a presedential election to the courts may well be risky to the rustic. So, the plenty despised Nixon had extra concern for the rustic than Gore did. As Nixon grew to become into the style of criminal, what does this say for Gore and the Democrats?

Answer 3

I'm sure regardless of who "gets" the White House the wiretapping will continue. It might become an issue for the suits to debate over but the tapping will go on. Laws are being changed everyday in our country, they have to remain flexible and diligence must be done. It is thru this flexibility and diligence that helps to insure our safety.

As for the soviets and the nazis, they didn't have the same things to deal with as the USA has. I think you mix apples and oranges when you talk of keeping company and our president.

I don't care if some college kid listens to every phone call I make, or sneaks into my pc and checks my surfing habits. I'm not doing anything wrong to put my country in peril.

As far as I'm concerned this is America, love it, or leave it!

Answer 4

There never has been a rule against eavesdropping. Wiretapping is the issue.

I believe that law enforcement agencies can pick your cell and cordless phone signals out of the air without a warrent without because we are broadcasting them on the airwaves for all to hear anyway.

Why not just hook up a PA system to your phone?

Answer 5

The Supreme Court judges have each been thoroughly vetted by both sides of Congress, and they have the final control of this, so if the Democrat party wins the White House, there should be little change. At least in theory, the courts are non-partisan, and so are law enforcement and the military. And J. Edgar Hoover IS dead.

Answer 6

Fact: several federal judges determined that the warrantless wire tapping was legal.
Fact: the program was instituted by the clinton administration for monitoring his political enemies.
Fact: Under the Bush administration its only been used as stated, to monitor all calls going to known terrorist phone numbers or calls going to area known to harbor terrorists.
Conclusion: Based on inarguable history, a democrat would use such a program SOLEY for his own benefit.
How would you vote?
Note: democrats "win" the white house? I doubt that, more like cheat, bribe, sue, swindle their way in...

Answer 7

Well sense it was done in the previous (that's Clinton for those that can't guess) administration and the Republicans didn't object. And if it is done in the same way for the same reasons in the future, I see no reason for an objection then. And if "Americans" are receiving calls from terrorist, you bet I want eavesdropping done. And in case you're worried, they don't care what you say to your mama when you call from school.

Answer 8

Do you really think that eaves-dropping wont happen if the Liberals are in Power ? - They will do it even more..!! If you have nothing to hide dont be Paranoid - just get on with your daily normal life - someone somewhere is listening to your call.

Answer 9

Good point.

The sad thing about the people who keep trying to justify the program is that they clearly have no understanding of the legal issues or the actual laws involved. Everything the NSA has done with the illegal warrantless wiretapping could have been done legally, just by following the proper procedures. The existing laws allowed for the same scope of and depth of surveillance legally.

Bush didn't break the laws because they would have prevented him from doing what needed to be done. Bush broke the laws simply because he couldn't be bothered to follow them.

{EDIT to LeoGirl} Yes, but Clinton followed the rules for FISA with his program. Or if he didn't he wasn't stupid enough to brag about breaking federal law like the current Commander-in-Sleep.

{EDIT to ArcherChris} Read the actual cases and the underlying laws, not just the news clips. You're talking about an entirely different program, under a different set of laws.

Answer 10

They will maintain their position on warrantless eavesdroppings, but put restrictions on the Democrats ability to use it...as they would use it for political gain.

Answer 11

The Nazi's and Russians also supported nationalized health care, abortion and gun control as well.